My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61025
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:44 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:59:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998055
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/20/1998
Doc Name
WHINNERY PIT FN M-98-055 110 APPLICATION REVIEW OF RESPONSES TO 7/2/98 ADEQUACY LETTER
From
DMG
To
HELEN WHINNERY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' III IIIIIIIIIIIII III • <br />5TA <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of fJal ural Resources <br />171 3 Sherman 51., Roont 21 5 <br />Denver, Colorado 80?03 <br />Phone: (303)A66-]567 <br />FAh~ 1303) b3? 8106 <br />July ] 5, 1998 <br />RECEI~JED <br />dUL 2 0 1998 <br />COLORADO <br />•Y <br />F ~F ~~~~~~C ""F~~E ~~CE <br />Helen Whinnery ~ I <br />2557 State Highway 149 OIV. OF MINERALS <br />Powderhorn CO 81243 6 GEOLOGY <br />Re: Whinnery Pit, File No. M-98-055, l ]0 Application, Review of Responses to 7/2/98 <br />Adequacy Letter. <br />Dear Mrs. Whinnery, <br />I~~ <br />llEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Ray Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5 Lochhead <br />Executive Duector <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />I have reviewed the responses submitted on your behalf, by Shani Eastin of Tuttle Applegate, <br />toward satisfying DMG's requirements fora 110 permit application. These responses were <br />written to answer the questions in my 7/2/98 adequacy letter to you. The response letter, which I <br />received yesterday, appears to adequately address all the questions I had raised, except for the <br />issues of the follow-up submittals (which consist of proofs of sending notifications to property <br />owners within 200 feet; proofs of filing original application materials and additional materials with <br />the county clerk and recorder; and a notarized affidavit of publishing one notice). These follow- <br />up materials, according to Ms. Eastin, will be forwarded to me as soon as possible. I must receive <br />all these materials before I may make any decision on the application. <br />The response letterjus[ received clarified a few technical issues as well. The maps specify that all <br />slopes will be created at a gradient of 3:1 during mining (and will be 3:1 for reclamation too). <br />There will be a 35-foot setback from the edge of the pit to the highway right-of--way. This is a <br />sufficient distance, for a pit no deeper than 20 feet, to maintain the area adjacent to the highway in <br />astable condition. Please ensure that the Qit slopes are not mined steeper or closer to the fence. <br />Based on the original application submittal and subsequent response submittals, I am ready to <br />approve your pernut application. However, as I will explain below, the decision cannot be made <br />yet. <br />I spoke with Ms. Barbara Chiappone, of our Denver office, last week about the financial warranty <br />and performance warranty which you will be submitting. The forms to be submitted were sent to <br />Steve at Mountain Agency in Montrose, who will be your bonding company. I explained to him <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.