My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE60873
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE60873
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:37 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:54:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Attachments A, D to F
Section_Exhibit Name
1996 PREFACE TO PERMIT APPLICATION
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIItONMENT <br />• WATER QUALITY CONTROL DMSION <br />Water Quality Protection Section <br />Memorandum <br />To: File <br />From: Jon Kubic ``~ <br />Date: September 28, 1999 <br />Subject: Inactivation Request <br />H-G Coal Company Hayden Gulch Mine <br />CDPS No. COG-850018 <br />Routt County <br />The permittee has requested inactivation. <br />The Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) has recently granted release of Phase II and <br />Phase III bond. As a condition of this approval, the CDMG has authorized leaving the two sedimentation <br />ponds that are the sources of the remaining discharge points under this permit for use as livestock and <br />wildlife watering ponds. As such, the potential for point source discharges from these ponds will remain, <br />• however, the sources will no longer be a regulated industrial activity but anon-regulated agricultural <br />activity. <br />Additionally, during my June 1998 site visit, I observed that there aze at least three spoils springs that <br />remain. None of these contribute significant flow and they usually do not reach either of the ponds. <br />Because they do not impact surface water, the CDMG has jurisdiction. They have determined that these <br />spoils springs are not of significant concern. There is no basis for the Division to disagree. <br />On the basis of the information detailed in this letter, I recommend inactivation. I also recommend that <br />the District Engineer not be requested to perform a site visit. There would be no benefit from such a <br />visit. <br />~ r~- ~g <br />,SAN 1 3 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.