Laserfiche WebLink
S.U SURFACE. ~YA'17;It <br />5.1 Sfreamllow Characteristics <br />A Large Percentage oi' the Annual Runufl' Occurs in Spring <br />and L'arly Summer Months as snowmelt i'rom the Higher Glevalious <br />In perennial streams in Area 61 the typical seasonal pat tern of runoll is base <br />flow /rom late fall to early spring, a snowmelt peak in spring and early summer <br />months, and occasional to frequent rainfall peaks in the summer months. <br />The typical seasonal pattern of streamflow in <br />Area 61 is shown by a representative hydrograph of <br />mean daily discharge (fig. 5.1-1). The hydrograph <br />illustrates mean daily flow of the Purgatoirc River al <br />Madrid, Colo., during water year 1979. Water year <br />1979, a year of greatervthan-average Clow, illustrates <br />the phases of the annual runoff cycle. The flow ilt <br />the river is virtually base flow from rite first of <br />October through the winter months. llcginning in <br />late April to mid-May, snowmelt from the higher <br />elevations of the Culebra Mountains to the west fills <br />the channel with spring nmoff. Typically, a large <br />percentage of the annual runoff volume occurs in the <br />spring and early summer months as snowuuh. lire <br />sharp peak flows in July, August, and September arc <br />from locally intense thunderstorms that occur in the <br />region. <br />As is characteristic of other streams in rite area, <br />streamflow in the Purgatoirc River is depleted by <br />diversions and is regulated by reservoirs. Upstream , <br />„f, ,,,,,from the Madrid gage are about 6,000 acres of~ <br />~ .. <br />~trrigated lands and several small oncttannel reser- <br />voirs. <br />Average and extreme discharges for the period of <br />record at selected streamflow gages in Area 61 are <br />listed in table 5.1-1. Average discharge is a some- <br />what misleading statistic for streams in Iltis area <br />because o(the large seasonal variation iu I low. <br />Predictive equations are available to estimate <br />mean annual flow (Qa), in cubic feet per second for <br />Colorado (Livingston, 1970) and for New Mexico <br />(Iiorland, 197(1). As these cyuntions were developed <br />on a stmcwidc basis it is to be expected that Ihcy <br />might be ICSS applicable in some areas oC the Stale <br />than in others. "fhc Colorado cyuation was dcvc- <br />lopcd using dma prcdumin:uuly for the uwunrtins of <br />central and northern Colorado. Iror Area 61, the <br />et)ualiott.s developed for Ncw tv9c.xico, based on <br />comparison of the methods using streamflow-gaging <br />station records farm the area, arc more applicable. <br />l h;u cyuation: <br />Qa = 3.24 X 10 5 A LUI SU.JJN 1~~2.51 LA0.517 <br />has :( standard crnrr of estimate of 51 percent. I he <br />sieni (icanl variables arc drainage area (A) in square <br />miles, main channel slope (S) in feet per mile, which <br />is the average slope between points III and RS percent <br />of the distance Imm Ilic site of interest and the <br />drainage divide, the mean Ctctobcr through April <br />precipitation (Pa) iu inches (front fig. 5.1-2), and the <br />latitude at the comer of the drainage basin (LA) in <br />degrees minus 30, lire above cyuation is for pcrcnni- <br />al (flowing year around) sucams only. Nu cyuation <br />exists t'or streams that are dry for a part of the year. <br />