My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE60742
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE60742
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:32 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:50:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/7/2004
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 3.0 Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3-4 <br />(d}(i) The area of the McClave Canyon watershed is approximately 483 acres. That portion <br />of the permit area which will not be reclaimed to AOC is approximately 2 acres or 0.41 % <br />of the total. Since the disturbance is so small relative to the total area involved, no effect <br />to the total volume of flows is anticipated. <br />(d)(ii) It is assumed that the CMLR is the only agency that will review the plan. If however, <br />additional agencies become involved, there should be no objections to the plan because <br />there are really no other environmentally sound ways to reclaim the area. <br />(e) The mine site is located on Federal Coal Lease # C-0125439. The US Bureau of Land <br />Management, Grand Junction Resource Area has reviewed the plans for reclamation of <br />the mine site and have requested that Salt Creek be allowed to reclaim the area as <br />shown on the plans. The letter of request is contained in Appendix K. <br />• (fl Responses to all requirements of 4.27.4 are detailed below. <br />(F~ All requirements of the Act, the regulatory program and the rules of the Division, including <br />but not limited to 2.06.5 and 4.27.4 will be complied with. <br />RULE 4.27.4 <br />~(1) No highwall remnant is proposed. Cliffs above the portals existed prior to' mining were <br />not disturbed except to scale unstable portions for safety reasons. Demonstrations that <br />postmining slope stability will exceed a safety factor of 1.3 are contained 'earlier in this <br />section. <br />(2) As demonstrated earlier in this section, hydrologic impact wi11 be minimal. <br />• <br />~ Volume 1 4~29~96 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.