PERMFILE60728 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Carl B. Mount July 21, 2003 Page 9 of 10 items noted by DMG, the applicant must supplement the material required by Rule 6.4.512-(a-, (c1, (d1, (fllii- & (iii-; Rule 6.4.12. Miscellaneous The application is deficient with regard to the application submittal requirements of Rule 6.4.8 -Wildlife Information; Rule 6.4.10 -Vegetation Information, specifically regarding annual crop production information; and 6.4.11 - Climate. The application must be amended to include the information and data required by these Rules prior to public or agency review and comment and certainly prior to permit approval. Petition for Hearing The foregoing reflects those concerns of my clients that have jurisdictional bearing in this forum. My clients are engaged in other regulatory venues regarding this proposal and are actively pursuing protection of their property rights in those venues as well. This application, for the reasons stated herein and others, is premature. It does not contain significant information and data that are necessary prior to mandated public review and agency action. The most logical course of action is for the applicant to collect the necessary data and resubmit a new compliant application, if the project remains feasible. Certainly, the information and data that is missing is significant enough to constitute more than a technical revision to the application. The new information required in this instance should at the very least be treated as an amendment triggering the notice and resetting provisions of Rule 1.6.6 and Rule 1.8.1. However, in the event that this application review process proceeds, and in light of the varied and substantial concerns regarding this application, as set forth herein, my clients respectfully request a hearing before the MLRB pursuant to the provisions of Rule 1.7.1(1) regarding the Haldorson permit application. Very my your Su~ ,L~c n osh