My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE60728
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE60728
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:32 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003037
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/31/2003
Doc Name
Objection Letter
From
Tisdel Hockersmith Mueller & McIntosh P.C.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Carl B. Mount <br />July 21, 2003 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />To the extent that attempts to satisfy any of these criteria in the future may <br />result in a corresponding reconfiguration or redesign of the project, the MLRB <br />application is both incomplete and premature.Z <br />Paragraph (2) of Rule 3.1.6 states as follows: <br />(21 Earth dams, if necessary to impound water, may be constructed if the <br />formation of such impoundments will not damage adjoining property <br />or conflict with water pollution laws, rules or regulations of the <br />federal government, the state of Colorado or with any local <br />government pollution ordinances. <br />This application does propose various clarifying and storage impoundments. <br />The application fails to disclose the design capacities and proposed method <br />of containment of these impoundments and does not quantify typical storm <br />water amounts, frequencies or intensities. Accordingly, it is not possible to <br />conclude that the proposed impoundments are adequate to contain expected <br />storm and ground water encountered on site during the life of the mine. <br />Additionally, as discussed above, the applicant has not applied for or <br />received required state of Colorado water storage rights appurtenant to its <br />proposed impoundments. The associated question of injury to senior vested <br />water owners is therefore, completely unaddressed, aside from the concerns <br />raised by my clients. <br />Paragraph (3) of Rule 3.1.6 provides: <br />(3) All surface areas of the affected land, including spoil piles, shall be <br />stabilized and protected so as to effectively control erosion. <br />The application does not contain sufficient detail in this regard and therefore <br />fails to demonstrate that disturbed surfaces will be stabilized and protected <br />so as to effectively control erosion. <br />Rule 3.1.7 contains requirements and criteria specifically addressing <br />protection of groundwater quantity and quality. That regulation provides, in <br />pertinent part: <br />Also in tfiis regard, tfie application fails to satisfy the mondated requirements of Rule 3.1.5(11) which prohibits "... <br />unauthorized release of pollutants to groundwater .. "and requires the applicant to demonstrate the measures <br />proposed to satisfy this requirement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.