My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO26540
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO26540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:46:01 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:49:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
4/25/2003
Doc Name
NPDES Biomonitoring (CO-0038776)
From
Mountain Coal Company
To
WQCD
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNTAIN COAL <br />~- COMPANY~.~.~. <br />A Suhsidiary afArch Wes[em Resources, LLC <br />RECEIVE® <br />APR 2 5 2003 <br />West Ells Mine <br />P O Box 591 <br />5174 Highway 133 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />(970) 929.5015 <br />Fax (970) 929-5595 <br />Apri122, 2003 <br />Ms. Cazla Lenkey <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment <br />Water Quality Control Division, Enforcement and Compliance Section <br />4300 Cherry Creek Drive South <br />Denver, CO 80222-1530 <br />Re: Mountain Coal Company, LLC, (MCC), West Elk Mine, CDPS Permit No. CO-0038776, <br />Notification, Status Report, and Evaluation of Biomonitoring for Outfa11017. <br />Deaz Ms. Lenkey: <br />Referencing my recent telephone conversation with you of April 8, 2003, MCC has passed the second <br />quarterly biomonitoring Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) testing as required and defined by MCC's <br />Permit No. CO-0038776. MCC also passed WET testing for the first quarter 2003. <br />As you may recall from our previous telephone conversations and meeting of Mazch 12, 2003, MCC <br />failed the October, 4th Quarter 2002 WET test for Daphnia magna (the fathead minnow Pimephales <br />promelas test passed). MCC then conducted accelerated toxicity tests. Those tests also resulted in failure <br />for the Daphnia and established a "pattern of toxicity". <br />MCC then enlisted the help of Wright Water Engineers (WWE) to determine the factor(s) causing the <br />pattern of toxicity to Daphnia magna at Outfa11017. MCC conducted sampling and analyses for metals, <br />inorganics, volatile organics, and semi-volatile organics, and the results did not indicate toxicity from any <br />of the pazameters measured. MCC sent this information to the WQCD in January 2003 as part of the <br />NPDES/CDPS reporting requirements for the 4~' Quarter 2002. <br />MCC completed a Preliminary Toxicity Identification (PTI) in November 2002, the results of which were <br />inconclusive. At this juncture, MCC elected to complete side-by-side Toxicity Identification Evaluations <br />(TIE} with two different laboratories (CT&E and SeaCrest}. MCC completed these tests because the <br />accelerated testing and PTI had shown a pattern of toxicity. An additional series of tests with alkalinity <br />were also conducted since data indicated that alkalinity could be the cause of the test failures. As <br />described in more detail in the letter from W WE to myself dated Mazch 7, 2003, the results of these tests <br />indicated that elevated total dissolved solids (TDS) and alkalinity, in particular, was the cause of the <br />toxicity to the Daphnia magna. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.