My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO26537
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO26537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:46:01 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:49:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Name
CERTIFICATION CDPS GENERAL PERMIT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Part II Page 17 of 20 <br />Permit No. COR-040000 <br />A. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (con[.) <br />6. Upsets <br />a. Effect of an Upset <br />An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with permit limitations and <br />requirements if the requirements of pazagraph b of this section are met. (No determination made during <br />administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, <br />is final administrative action subject to judicial review.) <br />b. Conditions Necessary for a Demonstration of Upset <br />A petittittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate through properly signed <br />contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: <br />1) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the specific cause(s) of the apse[; <br />2) The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; <br />3) The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Pan II.A.3. of this permit (24-hour notice); and <br />4) The pertrtittee complied with any remedial measures required under Section 122.7(d) of the federal <br />regulations. <br />c. Burden of Proof <br />In any enforcement proceeding the pennittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of <br />proof. <br />Removed Substances <br />Solids, sludges, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters shall be properly <br />disposed of in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering waters of the State. <br />8. Minimization of Adverse Impact <br />The pertnittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse impact to waters of the State resulting from <br />noncompliance with any effluent limitations specified in [his permit, including such accelerated or additional monitoring <br />as necessary to determine the nature and impact of.the noncomplying dischazge. <br />9. Reduction, Loss, or Failure of Treatment Facility <br />The petmittee has the duty to halt or reduce any activity if necessary to maintain compliance with the permit <br />requirements. Upon reduction, loss, or failure of the treatment facility, the permittee shall, [o the extent necessary to <br />maintain compliance with its permit, control production, or all discharges, or both until [he facility is restored or an <br />alternative method of treatment is provided. <br />It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would be necessary to halt or reduce the <br />permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. <br />l0. Proper Operation and Maintenance <br />The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and <br />related appunenances) which are installed or used by the petmittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this <br />permit. Proper operation and maintenance includes effective performance, adequate funding, adequate operator staffing <br />and training, and adequate laboratory and process controls, including appropriate quality assurance procedures. This <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.