My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE60189
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE60189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:11 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:35:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000156
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/22/2001
Doc Name
COULSON EXCAVATING CO INC BOSNER GRAVEL PIT FN M-2000-156 RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY REVIEW COMMENTS
From
WSI
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Coulson Excavating Company, Inc. - Bonser Gravel Pit <br />Exhibit D -Mining Plan <br />appropriate mitigation techniques will be implemented to ensure that the soil and groundwater are do- <br />contaminated promptly and efficiently. <br />Pit Setback and Maximum Cell Depth <br />A setback of at least 100 ft will be rnaintained from the Big Thompson River as measured from the pit <br />boundary to the near edge of the river. The pit boundary will be clearly delineated with flags. Within the <br />100 ft buffer zone, vehicular traffic, equipment, and any mining related activities will be forbidden. <br />In addition, the entve permit area will not exceed a vertical depth of approximately 32 ft, with mining <br />conducted at a 1:1 slope (see Figure 1, Exhibit D). <br />On and Off-Site Protection From the 100-Year Flood <br />Floodwaters aze expected to flow in an east northeasterly d'vection, with a velocity of 4 ft/sec fora 1 <br />chance flood event (Department of the Army, Omaha District, Corps of Engineers, 1977 Big Thompson <br />River Flood Plain Information). The 1977 Army Corps of Engineers study calculated 1 % chance <br />floodwater elevations to reach 4857 ft, 4855.5 ft, 4852 ft, and 4848 ft, from the western boundary of the <br />proposed excavation area to the eastern boundary, respectively (see Exhibit C). Because the proposed <br />gavel pit will effectively lower flood surface elevations and dissipate stream energy if floodwaters enter <br />the pit during a flood, its presence will not increase the risk of damage to existing structures. Moreover, <br />little risk exists of the gavel pit capturing the river after floodwaters recede. This can be assumed based <br />on channel constrictions at the I-25 Bridge, where the 100-year flood plain is constrained to no more than <br />40 ft from the main channel, and all floodwaters are forced to move through this corridor. This constraint <br />should effectivety cause floodwaters to become a placid backwater azea in the vicinity of the proposed <br />project, and lower the probability of stream bank modification. In addition to channel constrictions, the <br />combination of overburden stockpiles and a high density of riparian vegetation and ponds north and south <br />of the Big Thompson River, will contribute to the dissipation of stream energy, and effectively contribute <br />to the maintenance of the original stream banks following a 100-year flood. In the event that any channel <br />modification should occur within property boundaries, Coulson Excavating Company, Inc will ro- <br />excavate the modified azea to its original conditions. <br />During mining, overburden stockpiles will be partially or completely located in the 100-year floodplain, <br />and the asphalt batch plant will be partially located in the 100-year flood plain. Stockpiles are assumed to <br />be relatively stable in the event of a 1% chance flood event. This assumption is based on the fact that an <br />extensive root system will be in place due to the vegetation established on the berms; as well as the fact <br />that the berms will be considerably compacted due to the heavy machinery that travels on them. <br />Additionally, because the most recent 1 % chance event was roughly 15 years ago, the probability of <br />another 100-year flood occurrence during the span of operations is extremely low. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.