Laserfiche WebLink
• • ~ ar P l <br />~o~cP....__ .va4 <br />••.o <br />;`. GAIL <br />May 3, 2001 N'•. WEBB ~ o <br />'" o <br />TT '. :; P <br />To: Jim Mimiaga FoF..~o~oP <br />Cortez Journal <br />37 E. Main St. !~ Commission Expires 7/6!2003 <br />Cortez, CO 81321 <br />A word of caution! <br />As a visitor to the Dolores River Valley I have enjoyed the riparian habitat that <br />enhances the scenic beauty of the area. It was easy to understand why this route was <br />included in the designation of the San Juan Scenic Byway. That is why it is so <br />disappointing to see the valley bottom lands overwhelmed with gravel pits. The <br />rectangular, steep-banked pits remind an observer of a flood plain covered with <br />sewage lagoons. These pits, and particularly those planned near the town of Dolores, <br />not only detract from the beauty of the area but are potentially dangerous. <br />High gradient rivers with large catchment areas are flood producers. As a <br />professional geologist, I look at the Dolores River valley upstream from the town and I <br />see an alluvial flood plain with evidence that the river has repeatedly changed its <br />course across the valley. The stream is gravel-bedded on the alluvial floor and these <br />same gravels are being mined. These gravels that were moved by the river in the past <br />are also used for dikes between the gravel pits and the river. This means the gravel <br />dikes are unstable and will fail. <br />Rivers always try to take the path of least resistance and what could be easier than <br />to exploit a hole in the flood plain? Numerous examples exist of flooding rivers <br />diverted by gravel pits into unexpected new courses that have been very costly to man. <br />This behavior of rivers is so well known I am surprised it appears to have been ignored <br />in the Dolores Vally. Recent floods in the area have been relatively minor events <br />compared to recorded floods in the past. Even the 10,000 cfs flood of 1912, almost <br />twice the discharge of the memorable flood of 1995, pales when compared to the <br />geologic evidence of earlier floods that were 3 to 5 times larger. My main point is that <br />Dolores should expect large flood events and the gravel pits on the flood plain will <br />cause the channel to shift. It should be noted that although dikes along a river can <br />temporarity confine floodwaters, they provide little insurance against movement of the <br />channel itself. This is particularly true if the dikes are built of rocks which the river is <br />competent to move. Furthermore, dikes tend to flush lower flood flows downstream <br />and accentuate bank erosion in downstream reaches. <br />Several houses in the vicinity of the newly proposed gravel pit above Spruce Water <br />Canyon are highly susceptible to flooding from any channel shift induced by the pit <br />and from proposed river confinement. Likewise, channel shift above Dolores has the <br />potential of diverting the main flow of the river through the downtown area. At very <br />least, it is possible to guarantee that when the diversions occur the people of the area <br />will be strongly impacted and it is even possible the Scenic Byway, Highway 145, will <br />~~ <br />