Laserfiche WebLink
iiiiiuiiiiiiiuiu , <br />J.R. OWEN <br />218 8TH ST. <br />HUGO CO 80821 <br />719-743-2209 <br />Jan. 13, 19$9 <br />Mr. Daniel I. Hernandez, <br />Mined Land Reclamation Div. <br />215 centennial Bldg. 1313 Sherman <br />Denver, GO $0203 <br />~~ <br />u Q ,r 3 ~ F,~ <br />JAN i 71989 <br />PVi1,~~Fp LAPdD <br />R~CLA-~A'r7ply UIVIgIpN <br />Re: File No. M-$9-004. - Kit Carson County - <br />Duell Pit. <br />Dear I~;r. hernandez: <br />I have your letter of Jan. 9th concerning <br />the above application, and will attempt to answer <br />your coccments is the same order that you listed <br />them. <br />1. ~EaHIdIT F: keclamation Plan Map. <br />(a) I did not include a reclamation plan map as <br />noted in the reclamation plan narrative.. The <br />expected physical appearance of this mining <br />area will be exactly the same after reclamation <br />as before. I am not an engineer nor does <br />Kit Carson County have a county surveyor so I <br />use U.S.G.S. 7'~" Quad maps to locate contour <br />lines. Niy Quad Map shows the 4650' contour line <br />running parallel to and very slightly higher than <br />the creek bottom. There are no contour lines <br />showing a change inselevation of this creek <br />bottom. I doubt if tr~ere is more than one foot <br />difference in elevation between the downstream <br />end and the upstre®m end of the permit area. <br />(b) I have made a reclamation plan map (4 copies) <br />which I believe will comply with Rule 2.12 (6) (a). <br />I have included a 4647' contour line running <br />paralrel to the 4650' line <br />Other than the creek bcttom itself, which will be <br />reclaimed by flooding, the only reclamation will be <br />the stockpile area noted on the map. This small <br />area will be reclaimed following the plan sub- <br />mitted by the Soil Cons. Service, which is included <br />with the application. <br />