. • of ~o~o .. ~ II I I II I II I II IIII III • - . ;
<br />R`• 9a ~_~' DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
<br />.~ N~ ~ 2. -
<br />~~.,., ~ ,, r 'r ~Y ,y .- SDavid H. Getches: Executive Director 3fi~s ;: • ,t:,y ..p _ s;
<br />- '~°°` ' ~ : -MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION "~• ~ "'=°'`
<br />•'M1~, * ~g76_+ ~ DAVID C:.SHELTON, Director ~ - -_3°'=,Ks
<br />Richard D. Lamm `+r a .,.k.R• _ ',r '~~•, - '
<br />Governor .~ - x _ y,.' ~ M`~ ye
<br />+.E' ~ ° ~
<br />r ~ August 28,V1985~;- ••,F« .v. ~~ -- _ '~'~
<br />~ =' v~.:
<br />=.y,,, ~.. ate' ~ - - ;. 'h
<br />a •%.~. Cass .Wetier"~?$e ~- .l^= .~ ~ ,>.ac, ~ rs r
<br />~-s: ~~'•7 Bear. River Sand"& Gravel`- _ ~ r' ~ ~ .~ ~ ;.~- ~-;,., .,W ~ ~~.
<br />:f -Oak ,Creek; Coiorado~ 80467 ~' _ "'
<br />` ~ : ,;..
<br />,~ RE: Bear, River Pit, File 77 519 ,~ ~ ~~. ~ _ v_ ~ '.
<br />:~
<br />~- -. - Dear Mr... Weber:' T _ ~ -
<br />-,•' • We have reviewed •this file to determine its status in.relation to previous ~"' ''~'~ '
<br />r;. recornnendations. The following chronology represents what we can glean„from ~ X
<br />r . ,,: 1':•= Application received May 20; •1977 for. 9.9 acres: This was deemed ~ - ~.
<br />~`" ~''-'=- - inadequate via a letter sent"to you on,,July.13, 1977 ~ >~"
<br />" ~, - ,
<br />- 2. New application information was; receiJed'October• 31, 1977. This was l ~'`'
<br />- r ~, ~ -
<br />;•,~-. ; - -~ _. also, deemed, inadequate via,a letter~of October 25,- 1978. :,,~ '' ;..~_~",' ''
<br />~ - 3. '• New application information was received January-17,.1979. No action ~ :~
<br />_. ; ..
<br />- --~ ,- was taken, by the Division; therefore, by law,•the application was , .._r - -
<br />'automatically. approved. This ratification was relayed to you-via our .:. -
<br />- letter of January~.26, .1981.. - •r._ ~• ~ -. ,; .~ ,
<br />~_ ~4. Site inspection of Apri1;29, 1981 revealed a number of concerns that- '"
<br />_~.: w. i - -~ .- -
<br />- ~ needed to.,be'addressed." No reply to_this.inspection due to _.- ~+== ~ ems„
<br />_ : ,., -
<br />}~ ~~?`~ -. hospitalization of Mr: Weber. ~ _ ~: ~`'~
<br />' - - .. Y `A it' - '~ ~.
<br />4..'
<br />,, ~ 5. Site re=inspected May 6; 1982 and-the items raised in the April .29;;~}4,.,'-s~:_,: -• "
<br />- ~ •. 1981 inspection were reiterated. _A deadline of July 15, 1982 was given .`. ",
<br />- for. the submittal. of certain items. - ~~ ;:~-~
<br />- ~ 6:. Maps depicting previous and current-activiti es~at this•site were,:. -_
<br />`,.E -,- :.~ submitted on your behalf of Dismurke.& Dismurke, Inc: on August 27, -'' -= ,:,.~~.'
<br />1982. A request was made to set up a meeting to bring this site into -_`_,:;..,.. .
<br />' compliance.; however, it appears no such meeting occurred.. .~ - `.: _ `' -'
<br />.. 7..~J,; Letter-sent April 13; 1984 requesting the execution of financial and. ~ ,--?~~_
<br />z=- ....•y;-v.-- ~ .., erformance warrant forms'to brin this site-into le al_conformance.
<br />P Y 9 9 M1~ <
<br />r - ' ` ,No reply.tti•this letter, - '`-"" -~.~,,~ "
<br />"~,.~* As you can• see from.this..chronology•this .is, a confusing file ,There have }•~'~~
<br />~ been some attempts made to bring this site into compliance with4the law, but `~`u,.~
<br />{
<br />' ~,;~to~.date, ,nothin "has^comt3•to fruition "'- ~~" ~~" 5, %"'.-~~~"~"+
<br />~. ;?b ,~ '~'~r sa. : c .~''•~ x'~'dtir •`~. F .^ ve: _ 'ty~4 .4 ° „ .. ..ac .#+; ~`~' `T Y, ~ °` s ~ _ e ,
<br />
|