Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />• Pre-mining and post-mining water samples were collected from Wells 1 and 2 at Site 1 to <br />evaluate any changes in groundwater quality as a result of mining. The data showed that there <br />were no major changes. Site 2 revealed little appreciable change in groundwater quality due to <br />undermining, although it appeazs that hardness and calcium decreased and sodium increased <br />after mining. At Site 3, there were no major changes in water quality although there were <br />increases in hazdness and sulfate after mining. At Site 4, water quality was not altered <br />appreciably" (Johnson 1992). <br />Five observation wells, which were drilled above two adjacent longwall panels on Cambria, <br />Pennsylvania, were monitored. Samples of wellwater were collected before and after mining <br />progressed through the azea. "This study shows that (a) the observed changes in groundwater <br />chemistry did not affect the potability of the water..." (Matetic and Trevits 1992). <br />Water Stored in Sumns <br />A summary of events leading up to the decision to store large volumes of water in large capacity <br />sumps within the mine can be found in the previous section entitled Groundwater Quantity Effects. <br />The following section describes how, due to the unexpected inflows from the BEM and 14HG <br />Faults, previously mined NW longwall panels are used to store water volumes which exceed the <br />hydraulic capacity of the current treatment facilities. These panels will be used for storage to <br />optimize the mine water treatment system. also plans to use the NE and Box Canyon Panels sealed <br />sumps for storage of water in the same manner, <br />A distinct difference in the fault inflows and other "typical" mine inflows is water temperature. <br />Typical mine inflows are about 68°F to 72°F, and the fault inflows were approximately 84°F and <br />88°F, for the BEM and 14HG Fault inflows, respectively. A comparison of the BEM Fault <br />water with both "typical" groundwater quality in the B Seam is provided in Table 54. These <br />Tables demonstrate the similarity in water quality and show that the fault water can meet MCC's <br />NPDES discharge requirements without treatment, including the applicable temperature <br />requirements. <br />A description of the difficulties treating water containing a previously un-encountered colloid and <br />the treatment processes attempted aze discussed in the previous section entitled Basis for Large <br />Capacity Sump Use. While the source of this unusual colloid is not definitively known, MCC <br />believes that the clay particles may be inherent in the coal seam in the eastern part of the mine. <br />In recent years, mine dischazges through the existing treatment ponds have demonstrated an <br />increase in alkalinity and conductivity (TDS). At the present time it is unclear what is causing the <br />increase in TDS but it appears to be associated with mining rather than any change in groundwater <br />chemistry. Ongoing investigations are under way to further assess the potential cause for these <br />chemical changes. <br /> <br />1.05-250 Revised November 2004 PRIO <br />