My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE59255
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE59255
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:01:33 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:12:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/2/2004
Doc Name
2.05.6(3)(a-c) Protection of Hydrological Balance Part 3
Type & Sequence
PR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />. Numerous exploration boreholes have penetrated these channels and no appreciable <br />quantities of water or unusual water pressures have been encountered. None-the-less, if the <br />channels are fully or almost fully water saturated, and has hydraulic communication between <br />the up-dip and down-dip reaches, appreciable groundwater could drain into the EW Seam <br />mine workings. The volume of water that could drain into mine workings becomes <br />progressively greater toward the northeast. Damage zones associated with the various fault <br />zones previously described in this section have the potential to locally increase both the <br />permeability and storage capacity of the channels, thus increased roof inflow could occur in <br />the vicinity of the faults. Inflow estimates of as great as 500 gpm could occur if much of the <br />fault damage zone is water saturated. Such roof inflows are not expected to persist for more <br />than a few weeks. <br />The Bowie Sandstone is approximately 150 to 200 feet thick and located about 10 to 15 feet <br />below the E Seam. Because of the depositional history, mineralogical composition, geometry, <br />and structural architecture of the Bowie Sandstone are similar to the Rollins Sandstone, there <br />is the potential for appreciable groundwater inflows into the E Seam workings from this <br />source particularly if the projected fault systems are saturated. However, the thickness, water <br />level and pressure responses, and effects from B Seam mining provide insight into the <br />potential degree of E Seam saturation. <br />The Bowie Sandstone is less than one half the Rollins Sandstone thickness (400 feet). This <br />difference will not affect initial inflow rates; however it will have a profound effect on the rate <br />• of decline of inflow rates (i.e., will be considerably faster than that observed in the B Seam <br />when saturated fault systems were encountered). <br />No unusual water level observations and water pressures associated with the Bowie Sandstone <br />have been reported for the more than 100 exploration boreholes that have penetrated this <br />sandstone unit. Regional mining of the E Seam in the Oliver #2 Mine, Bowie and Oxbow <br />mines has not resulted in significant groundwater inflows. <br />The strongest evidence for relatively unsaturated conditions within the Bowie Sandstone is the <br />general absence of B Seam inflows from the mine roof in the fault damage zones. The base of <br />the Bowie Sandstone is generally 50 to 150 feet above the top of the B Seam. During the initial <br />stags of the Rollins Sandstone inflows from the fault damage zones, some water discharged <br />from the mine roof in a few locations within the B Seam workings. It is likely that these initial <br />roof inflows represent the draining of Bowie Sandstone water in the fault damage zone. <br />Fault related inflow from the underlying Bowie Sandstone has the potential to be as great as <br />those associated with the Rollins Sandstone. However, the relationship between the responses <br />of the Bowie and Rollins Sandstones to fault damage zones encountered during B Seam <br />mining suffests that large and persistent inflows will not occur. <br />Two groundwater monitoring wells (23-H-2 and 96-27-1) have been completed in the E Seam. Well <br />23-H-2 was completed in 1974. Water levels in 23-H-2 have been consistently neaz the bottom of <br />the hole. There has never been enough water to obtain a sample with a bailer. Annual Hydrology <br />Reports contain we1123-H-2 water level observations. This well is located adjacent to three other <br />2.05-235 Rn~isedNavemLrr 2004 PRIG <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.