My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE59131
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE59131
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:01:27 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:09:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/17/1989
Doc Name
BATTLE MTN RESOURCES SAN LUIS PROJECT FN M-88-112 COSTILLA CNTY REVIEW OF & RESPONSE TO S R KIRSTEN
From
MLRD
To
STEVEN G RENNER
Section_Exhibit Name
FIGURES C-12 SECTION D.9.1 FIGURE C-10 FIGURE C-11
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Section D.3.4 Facility Construction <br />Section D.3.4.1 General <br />12. The Division recommends that following the (12 inch) topsoil salvaging <br />operations, an additional 24 inches of subsoil be salvaged and stockpiled <br />separately from the topsoil for use in final reclamation efforts. Please <br />identify the subsoil stockpile locations on the appropriate Mining Plan Maps. <br />Section D.5 Mill Facilities <br />15. Detail 11, Typical Section of Perimeter Berm and Facility Pipeline <br />Corridor, of Figure C-12, Heap Leach Pad Typical Details, now illustrates that <br />the Heap pad Perimeter Berm primary liner is not <br />anchored into the berm. Please revise this illustration to indicate the <br />proper Heap Leach Pad liner anchoring design. <br />Review of the newly submitted Tailing Geochemical Laboratory Test (Result, <br />Appendix F.2, indicates that the results are identical to the test results <br />presented in the original Appendix F.2 submittal. Was the newly submitted <br />Appendix F.2 intended to present results form the dewatered tailing, or is <br />that to further appended? Please clarify. <br />18. Please indicate how the tailing material will be sampled to determine if <br />it has been adequately rinsed to achieve the 0.2 ppm free cyanide disposal <br />standard. Please define the proposed analytical test method; length of time <br />before results can be obtained; re-rinsing procedures and locations; and <br />re-testing methods. <br />Section D.6 Tailing Disposal <br />Section D.6.2.2 Geochemical Characteristics <br />21. As noted on the top of the September 16, 1988 Analytical Repot <br />presenting results on extracts from batch tests performed on the hailing <br />material, "the liquid used was deionized water with pH adjusted to 5.5 with <br />dilute H2SO4 (Sulfuric acid)...". Therefore, please discuss what effect the <br />dilute sulfuric acid used in the batch tests have on the sulfate cconcentration <br />reported in the tailing analysis. Can these sulfate data be considered <br />representative? <br />22. In unrelated cyanide solution sampling conducted by the Di vis~~on, in some <br />instances, laboratory analyses have reported higher levels of free cyanide <br />that total cyanide. In consultation with ACZ Laboratories, it was discussed <br />that the problem is most likely resulting from thin-cyanate interfr?rence. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.