Laserfiche WebLink
any cleazer on this issue. <br />Applicant's contention that the express language of CMR 1.4.1(5)(d) only applies to section <br />110 permits, notwithstanding the fact that CMR 1.4.5 provides that it applies to the 112 reclamation <br />permit process, defies logic. <br />In conclusion, until such time as the Applicant has applied for the appropriate special use <br />permit approval, the application in this matter cannot be considered complete pursuant to CMR <br />1.4.5(2)(b)(II). Further, in addition to special use approval, there are a number of other County <br />permits required before this mining operation could proceed -including grading permits for road <br />construction and sanitation permit(s) for human waste disposal facilities. None of these permits have <br />been applied for to date. <br />The County requests that the permit application be denied by reason of Applicant's failure to <br />apply for necessary local government approval as is cleazly mandated by the CMR.' Thus, the <br />Application is both incomplete and procedurally deficient. <br />Thank you for your consideration of these requests. <br />Very truly yours, <br />;L, P.C. <br /> <br />JJP/SMH <br />cc: Jeannie Nicholson- Chairman, Board of County Commissioners <br />Roger Baker, Gilpin County Manager <br />Tony Peterson, Director Community Development <br />1 It is not the County's position that such approval(s) must be granted as a condition of approval of a section 1 l2 <br />permit. CMR 1.4.1(5)(d) requires only that the Applicant apply for necessary approval from the County. Applicant <br />has applied for the required State Highway 119 access permit, but has not applied for other required permits. As will <br />become evident at the hearing in this matter, the landowner-applicant does not recognize local government (Gilpin <br />County in particular) as having legal jurisdiction over him or his property, for any purpose. <br />