Laserfiche WebLink
n • ~_~ • <br />Part I <br />Page li of 19 <br />Permit No. CO-0042562 <br />B. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS <br />11. Frequency and Sample Type - Chronic WET Testing <br />The monitoring frequency for chronic toxicity tests shall be once every <br />six months on a January - June, July - December sequence, and cannot <br />coincide with acute testing. Chronic tests will be static replacement <br />tests using three composite effluent samples, each of which is to be <br />composited for a minimum of eight hours. Chronic testing will be <br />conducted with both Ceriodaphnia ap. and fathead minnows during the <br />first year. During years two and three, if requested in writing by the <br />permittee, the Divsion may grant relief from continued two species <br />testing. Such relief shall be for continued testing with only that <br />species which has demonstrated the greatest sensitivity during the first <br />year of testing. The results shall be submitted on the Chronic Toxicity <br />Test report form, available from the Division. Copies of these reports <br />are to be submitted to both the Division and EPA. <br />The permittee shall conduct each chronic toxicity test in general <br />accordance with methods described in the Division guidance document <br />entitled Guidelines for Conducting Whole Effluent Toxicity Tests. <br />As general information, chronic toxicity occurs when there is a <br />statistically significant difference in survival, growth or reproduction <br />for either species. <br />12. Toxicity Reopener <br />This permit may be reopened and modified (following proper <br />administrative procedures) to include new compliance dates, additional <br />or modified numerical permit limitation, a new or different compliance <br />schedule, a change in the whole effluent toxicity testing <br />protocol, or any other conditions related to the control of toxicants if <br />one or more of the following events occur: <br />a. Toxicity has been demonstrated in the effluent and the permit does <br />not contain an toxicity limitation. <br />b. The THE results indicate that the toxicant (s) represent pollutant(s) <br />that may be controlled with specific numerical limits, and the permit <br />issuing authority agrees that the numerical controls are the most <br />appropriate course of action. <br />c. The THE reveals other unique conditions or characteristics which, in <br />the opinion of the permit issuing authority, justify the <br />incorporation of unanticipated special conditions in the permit. <br />