My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE58996
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE58996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:01:19 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:05:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/3/1981
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX E Rocky Mtn Geotechnical - Additional Testing 11/3/81
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in the roof as outlined by Obert and Duvall in 1967. The beam <br />theory utilized in this model does not adequately account for pre- <br />existing fractures and discontinuities in the rock. State of the art <br />engineering procedures in roof design today indicate that these <br />discontinuities are extremely important in controlling the behavior <br />and performance of the roof area. However, detailed information on <br />such discontinuities will not be available until such time as the <br />actual mining process has begun. Therefore, the beam theory approach <br />has been utilized solely to illustrate the relative effects of various <br />different t}°pes of roof reinforcement in the strata observed at the <br />location of Test Boring No. 3. <br />This procedure does assume that the rock strata in the roof area <br />will deform as elastic beams, with their deflection and the develop- <br />ment of stresses controlled by the density, thickness, and the value <br />of Young's modulus for each strata. It is further assumed that the <br />strata will reach a point of incipient failure when the theoretical <br />bending stresses developed in each strata reach the modulus of rupture. <br />Our first analysis deals entirely with stresses developed in <br />an unsupported, unreinforced roof section. Tunnel drifts and inter- <br />section areas were considered separately. Maximum indicated safe <br />spans were determined over a factor of safety range of from 9 to 6. <br />we have also considered separately the condition of the removal of <br />the thin shale layer immediately above the coal, and the suspension <br />of the shale layer. Results of this analysis will be found in Table <br />No. 1 in Appendix C. This indicates that ignoring the effect of pre- <br />existing fractures and discontinuities in the rock, fairly large <br />unsupported spans would be plssible in the tunnel drifts with rela- <br />tively large factors of safety. [when one accounts for the stress <br />S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.