My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE58996
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE58996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:01:19 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:05:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/3/1981
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX E Rocky Mtn Geotechnical - Additional Testing 11/3/81
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,~ <br />Layer No. 3 is the thickest of the three roof units considered <br />in this analysis and is a sandstone. Once again, the friction rein- <br />forcement affects a decrease in bending stresses of 168 to 250. HOW- <br />ever, since the sandstone unit is the thickest and stiffest of the <br />three considered, the effect of suspension is to actually increase <br />the bending stresses in this stiff sandstone layer. The effect of <br />suspension is to increase the bending stresses by something on the <br />order of 350. The net effect of combined friction and suspension in <br />this layer is a slight increase in bending stress of from 28 to 158. <br />This same data has been represented in another form in Table <br />No. 3. This table indicates a factor of safety against failure for <br />each layer and each roof span condition, as well as indicating changes <br />in factor of safety for different types of roof reinforcement and <br />support. For purposes of this table, the factor of safety is defined <br />as the modulus of rupture for that material divided by the theoretical <br />bending stresses in that layer. In this table it may be seen that <br />for consideration of friction effects only, the lowest and thinnest <br />of the rock strata are associated with the lowest factors of safety. <br />The thin shale layer immediately above the coal, in fact, does indicate <br />a factor of safety less than 1, which would imply a failure condition. <br />In the case of suspension effects only, stress conditions are, in <br />effect, reversed. The highest factors of safety are associated with <br />the thinner lower strata which are now transferring stress into the <br />upper, thicker layer causing a substantial reduction in the factors <br />of safety there. This would imply that under the effects of suspension <br />only, failure would initiate in the sandstone layer well up into the <br />roof material. In realtiy, if a tension failure were to initiate in <br />this upper sandstone layer, we would not anticipate that any significant <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.