Laserfiche WebLink
F. Extensions to file motions for post-trial relief. <br />No such motions have been filed or granted. <br />G. Date of filing of motions for post-trial relief. <br />No such motions have been filed or granted. <br />H. Date any motion for post-trial relief was denied. <br />No such motions have been filed or denied. <br />I. Date of filing notice of intent to seek appellate review with the <br />district court pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-4-106(9). <br />December 27, 2006. <br />J. Extensions to file notice of appeal. <br />No extensions to file notice of appeal have been requested or granted. <br />II. ADVISORY LISTING OF ISSUES TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL <br />A. Whether the District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of a <br />reclamation permit in file M-2004-067 despite the fact that the applicant <br />failed to comply with Construction Material Rules ("C.M.R.") 1.4. ] and <br />6.4.13 regarding local permits. <br />B. Whether the District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of a <br />reclamation permit in file M-2004-067 when the MLRB interpreted the term <br />"affected land" in a manner that directly conflicts with the plain language of <br />C.M.R. 1.1(3). <br />C. Whether the District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of a <br />reclamation permit in file M-2004-067 despite the fact that the applicant <br />failed to satisfy C.M.R. 6.4.19 and 6.5 regarding blasting. <br />D. Whether the District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of a <br />reclamation permit in file M-2004-067 despite the fact that the applicant <br />failed to present a sufficient Reclamation Plan in compliance with statutory <br />and regulatory requirements set forth in C.R.S. § 34-32.5-116 and C.M.R. <br />3.1.10 and 6.4.5. <br />3 <br />