Laserfiche WebLink
3a _ °n °`" .~. <br />=> -. ~ <br />DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF <br />DENVER, COLORADO <br />Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br /> COURT USE ONLY <br /> * <br />CITY OF BLACK HAWK, COLORADO, A <br />COLORADO HOME RULE MUNICIPALITY, et al., Case Number: 06 CV 2234 <br />Plaintiffs, <br />Ctrm: 22 <br />Vs. <br />STATE OF COLORADO MINED LANED <br />RECLAMATION BOARD, et al <br />Defendants, <br />Vs. <br />BLACK HAWK-CENTRAL CITY SANITATION <br />DEPARTMENT <br />Defendant/Cross Claimant <br />STATE OF COLORADO MINED LAND <br />RECLAMATION BOARD, <br />Cross Claim Defendants. <br />AMENDED ORDER <br />THE Mined Land Reclamation Boazd's issuance of a reclamation permit in file <br />M-2004-067 issued February 1, 2006 is AFFIRMED. <br />The decision of the Board is challenged by various parties for various reasons. <br />Several issues are raised regarding whether the application identified the previously <br />obtained permits from local governmental entities and from the Army Corps of <br />Engineers. Rule 6.4.13 only requires a statement that prior to operation, the applicant <br />will obtain al] necessary payments. Additionally, the requirements prohibit operation if <br />there is no scenario in which it can be conducted legally. <br />Several instances are alleged that the Boazd erred factually (the harm of vibration <br />levels, the adequacy of the re-vegetation plan, setting the bond level for re-vegetation, the <br />impact on waters of the U.S.) <br />Appendix B <br />