My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE58854
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE58854
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:01:08 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:02:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
X198316908
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/9/1982
Doc Name
MEMO on MEETING 11/19/82
From
MLRD
To
FILE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />STATE OF COLORA00 RiC HARD D. L4MM, Govcmm <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />DATE: December 9, 1982 <br />T0: Pittsburg and Midway, Fish Creek Mine File <br />FROM: Jerry Zimpfer <br />RE: Meeting, November 19, 1982 <br />On the afternoon on November 19, 1982, Jim Pendleton, Roy Cox, Dave Criag, <br />Bob Liddle, and myself met with representatives of Pittsburg and Midway <br />Coal and their consultant, Kaman Tempo. The meeting focused primarily <br />upon alluvial valley floors as related to the future Fish Creek under- <br />ground mine, although other hydrologic issues and subsidence were also <br />discussed briefly. A few of the topics discussed at this meeting are out- <br />line below. <br />The company wanted to know on what basis the alluvial valley floor signif- <br />icance determination would be made. The Division responded that Rule <br />2.06.Pi~(b) directs that the determination be based upon the significance <br />of the affected AVF to the farm's production. Therefore, the Division <br />will need information of both the production of the alluvial valley floor <br />and the production of the farm as a whole. We suggested that the company <br />attempt to find a common measure in which to express the productivity of <br />the diverse agricultural activities of the farm. (In subsequent phone <br />conversations with the company's consultant, this position was changed. <br />We agreed that the productivity of each agricultural activity practiced <br />on the farm should be expressed in terms of whatever units are an appropri- <br />ate measure of that activity. For example, measure wheat production in <br />bushels.) <br />The company wanted to know what farm boundaries should be examined since <br />the boundaries have frequently changed. We responded that it would be <br />best to use the farm boundaries as they existed on August 3, 1977. If <br />this is not possible, because information on agricultural productivity <br />at that time is not available, the company may use the current farm <br />boundaries. <br />The company asked if the alluvial valley floors were "grandfathered" as <br />result of CYCC's past mining activities, and how might this affect their <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.