Laserfiche WebLink
The rock structure left by the sites first mining activity (early 1900's) was likely to be beneficial to wildlife. The small <br />east facing bluff may have provided quail and deer with protection from the elements. It's likely that the rock in the <br />area was heavily utilized by insect communities and reptiles. <br />The mine's impacts to wildlife are likely to be minimal. The mine's surface acreage is small. A relatively small <br />amount of habitat was lost in the initial construction of the mine. The site is near an intermittent stream, but far enough <br />away that the impacts to the stream should be minimal. <br />The greatest impacts to wildlife will be from the increase in human activity. The area will/has seen increased vehicle <br />traffic. The noise and disturbance from vehicles, heavy machinery, and people may cause some species of wildlife to <br />avoid the area. This will tre especially true during the day. There is another active sandstone mine approximately .5 <br />miles north of Carrizo Stone South. The sum of the disturbance caused by both mines should be taken into account. <br />When the mining activity is completed, there is the potential to make the site's wildlife habitat better than it was prior to <br />mining. This will be dependant on what reclamation actions take place. <br />The site's scaled quail, deer, and reptile habitat quality could be improved through the reclamation. It's suggested that <br />the mine's south facing and east facine bluffs not be entirely backfilled. A height of five to ten feet of exposed bluff <br />could be left. This will provide scaled quail with a place to avoid avian predators, be protected from the winter's north <br />and west winds, and find shade in the heat of the day. Deer may also benefit from the bluffs and use them to get out of <br />the elements. If practical, the two bluffs should be sloped between 40°-60°. This will make it easier for quail to escape <br />over the bluff if threatened by predators below. <br />The greatest habitat loss in the construction of the mine was the loss of skunkbrush and Cholla. If skunkbrush can be <br />attained, it would be beneficial if it were planted throughout the site. It would be especially beneficial to plant <br />skunkbrush at the base and top of the bluffs. This will provide quail with excellent cover in preferred roosting <br />locations. Cholla could be transplanted onto the site to provide quail with additional cover. Cholla cactus is easily <br />transplanted, and could be transplanted from marginal quail habitat to the mine site. <br />Pinyons and Junipers should not be planted on the site. In southeast Colorado, Pinyon and Juniper stands have been <br />encroaching into, and taking over shrub communities. In most cases the quality of habitat is reduced as pinions and <br />junipers take over. <br />If grass is reestablished on the site, native buffalo-grass should be used. It may be preferable to not plant grass on the <br />site at all. If no Bass is planted, seed producing annuals will dominate the site for a few years after reclamation. The <br />annuals should provide more food to quail and other birds than buffalo grass would. <br />If there are some large rocks (l0inch +) left over from mining activities, it would be good to set those rocks aside <br />before backfilling. Those rocks should be scattered both individually and in small piles on the surface of the <br />topsoil layer. Aboveground rocks will provide areas where insect communities can get established. Many bird and <br />reptile species depend heavily on these insect communities. The rocks would also provide daytime shelter for <br />reptiles. <br />Thank you for considering our comments. <br />Sincerely, <br />~r~ ~~~ - <br />Travis Black <br />Area Wildlife Manager <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />(719)336-6600 <br />