Laserfiche WebLink
33 <br />• 1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />• 13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />. 24 <br />25 <br />slopes or ramp access between the lifts within the <br />pit. <br />Again, as far as the stability goes, <br />there was a concern about the potential stability or <br />instability of the south -- of the south waall of the <br />west pit, that wall which is adjacent to the Rito <br />Seco here. <br />We feel that this has been <br />satisfactorily addressed by the commitment to create <br />a rock buttress adjacent to the south wall when the <br />operation is completed. The buttress would be <br />essentially end dumped from the south wall and would <br />be built to the top of the Santa Fe conglomerate, <br />which would be the potentially unstable areea. <br />Again, we do not have speci}°ic -- I'm <br />sorry -- we have been given engineering deeoigns for <br />this. We received the designs very recently and have <br />not had an opportunity to evaluate those dersigns. <br />We do feel that the general concept is <br />sound, and again I will address this as ones of the <br />two -- three outstanding issues towards the end of my <br />presentation. <br />Considering -- concerning the waste <br />disposal configurations, our previous concern was <br />that the waste disposal areas in their proposed <br />