My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE58182
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE58182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:00:29 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:45:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIC GROUND STABILITY INVESTIGATIONS 005 GULCH AND VICINITY
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 13 ATTACHMENT 13-3B
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Unfortunately, the r•ecor•d of ground observation in 005 Gulch, and the <br />precipitation events are not adequate to substantiate or clearly define • <br />such a relationship. <br />8. A tentative relationship has been established between ground stability and <br />percent of topographic slope, bedrock dip, and erosional patterns. The <br />data available indicate a critical topographic slope of about 16% and a <br />bedrock dip of about 90 (16%). Ground failure also takes place at lower <br />slope and dip levels, and it is thought that these are caused by an <br />increased amount of shale, and possibly water. <br />3.2 Recommendations <br />Recommendations for a report of this type prepared for design engineers <br />essentially encompass the body of the report itself. <br />1. The criteria, outlined in the report, that affect design should be <br />followed. <br />2. If conflicts develop in design between the reported criteria and feasible <br />design, further geologic review should be undertaken. <br />3. If unexpected conditions are encountered during construction of the <br />proposed sedimentation pond and the haul road, further geologic review <br />should be undertaken. <br />4. A comprehensive drainage plan should be part of the design for• Haul <br />Road G, particularly in the reach from Sta. 51+50 to Sta. 63+90. <br />• <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.