Laserfiche WebLink
PARTI <br />Page No. 4 <br />Permit No.: CO-0045161 <br />~ 2. Alternate Limitation Burden of Proof Requirements (continued) <br />a. For rainfall [o waive TSS and total iron limitations, it is necessary to prove that discharge occurred within 48 hours after <br />measurab a precipitation has stopped. In addition, to waive settleable solids limitations, it is necessary to prove that discharge <br />occurred within 4p8 hours after precipitation greater than [he 10-yeaz, 24-how event has stopped. <br />b. For snowmelt to waive TSS and total iron limitations, it is necessary to prove that discharge occurred within 48 hours after pond <br />m o'~w 1 as stopped. In addition, to waive settleable solids limitations, tt is necessary to prove that discharge occurred within 48 <br />hours after pond inflow volume gea[er than the ] 0-year, 24-hour even[ has stopped. <br />Should a precipitation event or snowmelt occur, the permittee shall submit adequate proof in order for an exemption to be claimed. <br />Weather station data may be apppro riate in making this demonstration. Said proof shall be submitted as an attachment to the <br />Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR~for the appropriate period. The Division shall determine the adequacy of proof. As part of this <br />determination, the Division shall evaluate whether the permittee could have controlled the discharge in such a manner that primary <br />limitations could have been met. All manual dewatermg of ponds that are equipped with automatic dewatering systems must meet <br />TSS and total iron limitations. If a pond has only manual Sewa[ering capability, relief is available only [o [he extent required [o <br />regain necessary stability and capacity. <br />3. Post-Mining Areas <br />In conformance with 40 CFR 434.50, commencing at the time active mining has ceased and all surface areas served by a <br />sedimentation pond have been returned to the requved contour and revegetation has commenced, applicable discharges may be <br />eligible for post-mining limitations. In most cases, these post-mining limitations shall remain in effect until bond release. The <br />permmee shall notify the Division at the appropriate time so that consideration of permit modifications can be made. Prior to <br />notification and subsequent permit modification, active mining limitations will apply regardless of actual mine status. <br />4. Comoliance Schedule(s) <br />a. Final Total Recoverable Iron Limitations: The pemtittee shall achieve compliance with the final effluent limitations for total <br />recovera a uon o Part LA.1. ., a ecttve January 1, 2008, in accordance with a schedule of compliance approved by the <br />Division. <br />i. The permittee must, by June 30, 2005, submit a plan for approval that identifies operational changes, modification of the <br />existing treatment system, or constmction of a new treatment system. A schedule of dates to accomplish various tasks <br />related to the plan should also be included such that compliance with the final Total Recoverable Iron limitations may be <br />attained. <br />ii. The permittee must, by December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, submit progress reports summarizing the progress in <br />implementing the plan such that compliance with the final To[a] Recoverable Iron ]'mutations may be attained. <br />iii. The permittee must, by December 31, 2007, submit srudy results that show compliance has been attained with the final Total <br />Recoverable Iron limitations maybe attained. <br />Upon approval of the implementation plan by the Division, all terms and conditions of the implementation plan, including but <br />not lmuted to the compliance schedule, will automatically become conditions of this permit. <br />Progress reports must be submitted for tasks identified in the above schedule. Refer to Part I, Section D, Reporting <br />Requirements, for specific information. <br />No later than 14 calendar days following each date identified in the above schedule of compliance, the permittee shall submit <br />either a report of progress or m the case of specific actions being requred by identified dates, a written notice of compliance or <br />noncompliance, any remedia~ actions taken, and the probability of meeting the next scheduled requirement. <br />A schedule for the elimination of the discharge, through connection to another treatment system or by other means, may be <br />substituted for this schedule of upgrading. <br />b. Salim~t + Sm~d The permittee must submit a report addressing salinity by December 31, 2006. Because there is no record that <br />e pth ertnittee has previously submitted this report, a compliance schedule is included for the performance of the srudy. <br />However, if a report has previously been submitted, the permittee should submit a copy of this report in lieu of the performance <br />of another study. <br />B. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS <br />1. Frequency and Sample Type <br />In order to obtain an indication of the probable compliance or noncompliance with the effluent limitations specified in Part I.A.1, the <br />permittee shall monitor all effluent parameters at the following frequencies. Such monitoring will begin immediately and last for the <br />life of the ppemit unless otherwise noted. The results of such monitoring shall be reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report form <br />(See Part I.E.). <br />a. Outfalls OOIA through O]OA <br />arameter eequrement requency amp a ype <br />ow on nstantaneous or onunuous <br />ota us en a oism on ra <br />ett ea a oism ont ra <br />i an rease m on[ isua <br />Revised 1242005 <br />