My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57905
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57905
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:00:14 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:37:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/19/2002
Doc Name
GROUND MOTION ATTENUATION STUDY
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 14 ATTACHMENT 14-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The ground motion is measured in terms of peak particle velocity and is a combination of body and <br />surface waves (Figure 1)~. The body waves attenuate more rapidly with distance from the shot than <br />the surface waves. Body waves spread spherically, whereas the surface waves expand in two <br />dimensions. The principal cause of ground motion attenuation with distance is due to simple <br />geometric spreading. As the ground <br />motion wave train s reads outwards <br />Fi,¢ure 1 -Surface and Body Waves y p g <br />upon the surface, they are converted <br />• to surface waves. Body waves may also be reflected and refracted to the surface to become <br />converted to surface waves. As the surface wave spreads out, the various components of the wave <br />train have different particle motions, travel at different velocities, and have different geometric <br />constraints. <br />Particle velocity has been determined to be the most significant single parameter, in terms of the <br />potential for damage (as opposed to acceleration or displacement). Furthermore, the peak particle <br />velocity found on any of the three geophone channels is the parameter used, rather than the resultant <br />vector sum particle velocity. All research has been done and all regulations have been written in <br />terms of peak particle velocity (PPV). Using the PPV instead of the vector sum allows for easier, <br />more consistent comparison of values. A true resultant velocity could be calculated from the peak <br />measurements for all three components if they occurred at the same instant of time. In addition, <br />there is variability in how different seismograph manufacturers calculate the vector sum. Some <br />actually calculate a pseudo resultant sum. These models take the peak levels on all three channels, <br />regazdless of where they individually occurred in time, to calculate the vector sum. <br />r Rosenthal, M.F., and G.L. Morlock. Blasting Guidance Manual. U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of <br />1 Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Mazch, 1987, p.l I . <br />Ibid., p. 12. <br />• <br />P <br />from the energy source, the <br />medium's individual particles are set <br />in retrograde elliptical motion about <br />their rest positions. The wave is <br />generated as each particle transmits <br />energy to the next particle. Some <br />energy loss occurs with each <br />transmission of energy from one <br />particle to the next, which is also a <br />cause of ground motion attenuation <br />with distance. The ground motion is <br />a complex wave train consisting of <br />man different wave types (Fi e <br />3 <br />Y ~ <br />2)~. As the bod waves im in e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.