My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO25483
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO25483
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:45:13 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:36:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
7/17/1998
Doc Name
WET TEST FAILURE AT DISCHARGE POINT 005 PN CO-0000221
From
SENECA COAL CO
To
CDOH
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />LC50 created in the accelerated test was 80.5%. Therefore although the effluent produced a <br />toxic effect (and LC50 concentrations) in the cerio tests, it was not as toxic as predicted by the <br />model. This could imply that other components are present in the effluent that mitigate the toxicity <br />from the TDS. <br />Daphnia magna Test <br />The analysis for the Daphnia magna did not show an LC50 concentration produced in the <br />005 effluent. Although the analysis suggested that the Daphnia magna could have a survival <br />effect in the 100% effluent, the actual test results showed no significant effect in any effluent <br />concentration of the test. <br />DISCUSSION <br />By using the GRI Freshwater STR model it was determined that the 005 effluent contained <br />quantities of dissolved solids that could cause a toxic effect to Cenodaphnia tested in the <br />discharge. This toxicity was found in actual tests, although at slightly lower toxicity levels than <br />the model predicted. <br />The model detenined that there would be no LC50 concentration produced in tests with <br />the Daphnia magna in the 005 discharge. The results of Daphnia magna tests run in the same <br />discharge samples as the Cenodaphnia showed no significant toxicity in any effluent <br />concentration. <br />The PTI performed with the STR model indicates that TD5 was the cause of the toxicity <br />seen in the Cenodaphnia tests conducted with the 005 effluent. It also suggests that tests <br />conducted with the Daphnia magna would show a reduced toxic response to this discharge. <br />Daphnia magna are known to be less sensitive to TDS levels than the Cenodaphnia. Daphnia <br />magna is an EPA-approved alternative invertebrate species for acute WET tests when evidence <br />suggests that TDS is the cause of a toxic response in the Cenodaphnia tests. Therefore since <br />TDS is not considered a "toxicant" at levels where the Daphnia magna are not affected, it should <br />be possible to substitute the Daphnia magna for the Cenodaphnia in the WET testing if the <br />CDPHE approves the permit amendment. <br />REFERENCES <br />APHA/AWWANVPCF. 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. <br />16th Edition. American Public Heaith Association. 1268 pp. <br />Hach Chemical Company. 1978. DR-EL/2,3 and 4 methods manual. Hach Chemical Company, <br />Loveland, Colorado. <br />Weber, C.I. 1993. Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters <br />to Freshwater and Marine Organisms (Fourth Edition). EPA 600/4-90/027F. 293 pp. <br />J.E. Tietge, Mount, D.R., Gulley, D.D.. "GRI Freshwater STR Modei and Computer Program". <br />Gas Research Institute, Chicago, III. 60631. December 1994. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.