My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57715
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:00:01 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:34:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 16 PROTECTION OF THE HYDROLOGIC BALANCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• annual precipitation. Evapotranspiration rates in the region are relatively high <see <br />Tab 7, Hydrologic Description). The infiltration rate of precipitation through the loamy <br />soils and overburden, based on permeability races, is estimated to be slow to moderate- <br />Slow infiltration rates are common for this area and for this climate since the majority <br />of recharge to local aquifers occurs from the gradual infiltration of snowmelt water. <br />Overburden and topsoil handling, reconditioning, and revegetation methods outlined in iab <br />21 (Minesoil Reconstruction) and Tab 22 (Reveget ation Plan) will maximize the potential <br />for establishing reclaimed areas that yield infiltration rates and capacities equal to or <br />greeter than premining soil hydraulic conditions. Since the texture of the replaced <br />topsoil is generally loam to clay loam, the infiltration rate through [he topsoil will be <br />slow to moderate. Deep ripping of final graded spoil where severe compaction exists, <br />followed by topsoil placement and disking or direct haulage of topsoil where practicable <br />will enhance the infiltration potential of the reclaimed materials. <br />Significant ground water discharge to mining pits will be removed by pumping the water to <br />those sediment ponds designed to have the prescribed minimum volume for the 10-year, <br />• 24-hour storm event. Design criteria for the ponds is described in Tab 13 (Facilities), <br />and it includes plans of storage for additional volumes pumped from pits or sumps. <br />Maintenance of available storage capacity in the ponds involves dewatering and sediment <br />removal. <br />Ground Yater Monitoring. Peabody, in conjunction with the USGS, began ground water <br />monitoring at Yoast in the summer of 1980. Additional monitoring wells were installed in <br />1990. Currently [here are 56 ground water moni [oring wells at the Yoast complex. <br />Complete details of ground water monitoring are described in Tab 15, Hydrologic <br />Monitoring Program. Plans [o monitor the extent and magnitude of any mining impacts on <br />the ground water system are described in detail in Tab 18, Hydrologic Reclamation Plan. <br />Cround water monitoring wells will be maintained for the life of the mining operations or <br />until such time as [he CM LRD may agree that they are no longer necessary. AlL ground <br />water monitoring installations will be removed upon completion of the postmining <br />hydrologic monitoring phase of the Hydrologic Monitoring Plan unless they are approved <br />for postmining land uses. <br />• All ground eater date collected from monitoring wells in each future water year will be <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.