My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57707
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57707
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:00:00 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:33:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/10/1988
Doc Name
REGRADED SPOIL SAMPLING
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 1987 Report Section 4.0
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0 REGRADED SPOIL LABORATORY RESULTS <br />In order to focus on what Trapper considered a potential spoil problem, <br />Trapper Mine proposed and CMLRD agreed to abandon its current program for <br />sampling in-place overburden and provide yearly analysis and reports on <br />regraded spoils. The annual report will demonstrate that a surface spoil <br />layer exists with acceptable physical and chemical properties. With Che addi- <br />tion of suitable topsoil, these regraded spoils provide a suitable medium to <br />promote plant growth and successful reclamation. <br />4.1 Methods <br />Composite samples were taken on approximately 50-ft to 100-ft centers fur <br />each mapping unit. Mapping units in 1987 were determined by visual and <br />textural difference with no size limitation, however a minimum sampling <br />density of approximately one sample per five acres of reclaim area will <br />be performed in the future. Each sample was a composite from the top <br />four inches of spoil material. Future sampling will be composite samples <br />from one foo[ into the spoil material. The samples were analyzed for pH, <br />EC, CaC03, O.M., N03-N, P, K, Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, Se, Ca, Mg, Na, SAR, % <br />Saturation, texture, Hg, F, Total S, and acid-base potential. If a large <br />negative acid-base potential was found, then additional analysis to <br />include pyritic Sulfur and S04-S was run for that sample. The final <br />mapping units were then transferred to the spoil history map, M4-1. Each <br />delineation on this map was identified as to year sampled, texture, and <br />lab analysis number. <br />4.2 Results <br />Spoil laboratory analysis was conducted by the Colorado State University <br />Soil Testing Laboratory and are provided in Table 4-1. Interpretation of <br />these data are presented in Table 4-2 and include verbal interpretations <br />which are intended to describe laboratory values in relative practical <br />terms. "Good" is used to indicate data characteristics that do not pre- <br />sent a problem while "excessive" is used to point out which values may <br />present a possible toxicity problem. Following is a brief description of <br />each parameter as described in the literature and how suitability cri- <br />teria were assigned to each. <br />pH - Measure of the degree of acidity or alkalinity of a soil. Optimum <br />pH values range from 6.0-8 .4 (Merritt 1983). Actual spoil pH deter- <br />mination ranged from a low of 6.8 to a high of 8.0 (z = 7.3) on <br />Trapper spoils. <br />Electrical Conductivity - Conductivity is an indirect measure of the <br />solvable salts in the soil. Optimum EC values in terms of plant <br />growth are <4.0 (Merritt 1983). Actual spoil analysis at Trapper <br />ranged from .4 to 3.9 (z = 1.9). <br />cont. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.