1999-01-27_PERMIT FILE - M1999006

• Permit No: M1999006
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 1/27/1999
• Doc Name: CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REGULAR 112 OPERATION RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Exhibit D - Mi*g Plan •
variations in the location of: stockpiles, boundaries of extraction, and related information relative to
adjacent structures and easements; from that represented on Exhibit C-2: Mining Plan Map-
Typical Extraction Limits, will be represented in a later, Exhibit C-3: Protection of Existing
Facilities Plat, as developed and certified by a professional engineer. In the interim, the genet
format shown on Exhibit C-1: Pre-Mining Map has the proper certification for protection of
structures located within 200 feet from the proposed extraction limits.
This submittal forecasts the maximum extent of affected land expected at any given point in time
during the life of the operation [refer to Exhibit L-Reclamation Costs]. The forecast will be
verified with each DMG Annual Reports to assure that the actual amount of lands affected remain
within the limits warranted for under this original submittal. At any point during the next 30 years,
should field conditions exceed those estimated under the original submittal, the change will be
reflected in the next Annual Report. A rider to the warranty would be provided at that time to
reflect the conditions.
Acreage to be affected during the first year of extraction activities will be determined by the initial
Wash Pond and attending Settling Pond(s), Plant Site,and Initial Area of Extraction. While the
acreage required for the Plant Site and Wash Pond are not expected to change,the Initial Area of
Extraction will expand until concurrent reclamation follows over the shoulder as each location is
exhausted of resource, as previously described.
Final slopes and grades will be concurrently established at 3h:1v,or flatter, from 5±feet above to
10±below the expected water level of each location of extraction. Actual locations of flatter slopes
and escalloped shorelines [refer to Exhibit H-Wildlife Information] will be field fitted by grading
or other cut/fill activity to optimize final shoreline irregularity. Final disposition of each reclaimed
shoreline will be measured and resulting maps included in the Annual Report pertinent to that years
activities.
Slopes may approach 2h:1 v at depths of 10±feet below the expected water level to the pond
bottom. To the extent possible, pond bottoms will be left rough,with the possible introduction of
logs or other non-putrescent inert material to aid in aquatic habitat and cover [Refer to Exhibit H -
Wildlife Information].
Reclamation will follow guidelines established under Exhibit E-Reclamation Plan. NOTE:
Shoreline irregularities and fill to establish and enhance the aesthetic and end-use functions of the
resulting basins is not shown on Exhibit F: Reclamation Plan Map,as this effect will be field fitted
and representations are too general to be accurately portrayed. Exhibit F simply identifies the near
maximum extent [typical] of the resulting basins or ponds.
) A map(in Exhibit C- Pre-Mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands, (Subsection
6.4.3)may be used along with a narrative to present the following information:
i) nature, depth and thickness of the deposit to be mined and the thickness and type o
overburden to be removed(may be marked "CONFIDENTIAL,"as per Paragraph
1.3(3)); and
ii) nature of the stratum immediately beneath the material to be mined in sedimentary
deposits.
The upland terrace is nearly level and supports a variety of crops. U.S.G.S. Geologic Maps
describe the majority of the site as Piney Creek Alluvium to an approximate depth of 20 feet. Field
cores suggests depths can vary to approximately 40±feet to shale.
EXHIBIT D- Mining Plan 5
Colorado Division of Mineral s& Geology Regular Impact [1121 Construction Material Permit
Sand Land, Inc. - Kurtz Resource Recovery & Development Project -January 1999