My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57610
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57610
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:56 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:31:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1989065
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/15/1989
Doc Name
WINKLER LIGHT AGGREGATE QUARRY HALLETT MATERIALS APPLICATION JUNE 1989
From
TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~- _ • • III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK <br />(303) 660-1015 680 N. Wilcox St. Castle Rock, Colorado 80104 <br />August 14, 1989 <br />Et'1 ~ !s ~' 1V <br />Department of Natural Resources: AUG 15 1989 <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division MINED LAND <br />215 Centennial Building RECLAMATION OfVISfON <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: Winkler Li hg t Aggregate Ouarry -Hallett Materials Application -June. 1989 <br />Mined Land Board Members: <br />Attached you will find a letter (Exhibit A) signed by residents of Castle Rock, Franktown, <br />and others who represent local planning groups. In support of many of their concerns, the <br />Town of Castle Rock, Colorado is going on record as opposing approval of the mined land <br />reclamation permit for the Winkler Light Aggregate Quarry to be operated by Hallett <br />Materials. The Town requests the Mined Land Reclamation Board to deny the permit for <br />this operation, based on the following reasons: <br />1. Inability for long-term, vigilant control of operations. <br />The revisions to the Mined Land Reclamation Act (HB 162, 1988) <br />make it impossible for the Town or the County to have any control <br />over the reclamation process on this site. The quazry's proximity to <br />the Town makes this fact unacceptable (one mile, not "more than two <br />miles" as stated in Exhibit Q of application). In comments at an <br />August 8, 1989 public meeting on mining in Colorado Springs, many <br />complaints support the contention that mining quarries within the state <br />are not being reclaimed in accordance with their permits. In addition, <br />MLRD records of non-compliance complaints, and the imposition of <br />fines, indicate that the proposed operator has not met reclamation <br />requirements on other mining permits in Douglas County and, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.