My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57597
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:55 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2005080
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/30/2006
Doc Name
Copy of Letter from Mr Curtis to State Engineer
From
Harvey W. Curtis
To
OSE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HARVEY W. CURTIS & ASSOCIATES <br />Mr. Kevin Rein <br />File No. M-2005-080 <br />May 26, 2006 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />clearance from the State Engineer's Office, including a well permit and a Substitute Water Supply <br />Plan . A copy of Mr. Waldron's April 19, 2001 Inspection Report is attached hereto as Exhibit D. <br />On September 15, 2005, Ms. Pickford conducted a second inspection of the Ansley Pit #2 site. Ms. <br />Pickford found that "The majority of the pit contains exposed groundwater ...The permit for this <br />site does not include pazameters for the exposure of groundwater. This problem was cited in the <br />previous inspection report dated April 19, 2001, and the problem was not resolved. The Division <br />is not aware of the operator receiving the proper clearance and permits with the Office of the State <br />Engineer to allow for exposure of groundwater." A copy of Ms. Pickford's September 15, 1995 <br />Inspection Report is attached hereto as Exhibit E. On April 4, 2006, the County responded to <br />DMG's concerns on the Ansley Pit #2 and stated that "Pazk County is in processing of an <br />augmentation plan and supplemental water supply plan." A copy of the County's response is <br />attached hereto as Exhibit E. <br />The Ansley Pit #2 is immediately adjacent to the proposed Allen mining site. Applicant, <br />Allen Drilling and Excavating Co., Inc has also stated that it plans to excavate down to <br />approximately 10 feet and claims the excavation will not expose groundwater. Based on the Ansley <br />Pit #2, it is very likely the proposed Allen Pit mining operation will expose groundwater. Therefore, <br />C Objectors ask that the Office of the State Engineer provide a response to the Allen Pit permit <br />application and, in doing so, consider the following as a condition for approval of this application: <br />"If the proposed Allen Pit mining operation exposes groundwater, the applicant will need to obtain <br />either a gravel pit or other type of well permit, as applicable. However, prior to obtaining a permit, <br />an approved water supply plan or decreed plan for augmentation is required. The applicant must <br />also show that no injury to other vested water rights will occur as a result of this gravel pit project." <br />Thank you for your time and prompt consideration in this matter. If you have any questions, <br />please do not hesitate to contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~ ~/J~ <br />Sheela S. Stack <br />/sss <br />Encl. <br />cc: Ms. Kate Pickford <br />Ms. Angela Bellantoni <br />Ms. Linda Kukulski Miller <br />Mr. Greg Cassarini <br />Mr. Fred Wisely <br />Ms. Katie Fendel <br />Mr. Robert L. White <br />Mr. Curt Sayer <br />Mr. Kent Rolf <br />C:\sspwpdws\Whi~elRein LeVecwpd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.