My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57580
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57580
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:54 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:30:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/20/2001
Doc Name
MEMO MINING SETBACKS S&H MINE PLATE VALLEY SAND & GRAVEL LLC FN M-2000-158
From
ALLEN SORENSON
To
ERICA CROSBY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'~ • • III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />Memo <br />To: Erica Crosby <br />Fm~re Allen Sorenson <br />CC: Cad Mount, Tom Schreiner <br />Date: 02120/01 <br />Re: Mining Setbacks, S 8 H Mine, Platte Valley Sand 8 Gravel, L.L.C., File No. M-2000-158 <br />I have reviewed the S & H Mine permit application and the proposed setbacks from the South Platte River and <br />from existing permanent and valuable manmade structures. The following discussion pertains to the setbacks <br />and reclaimed slopes that are proposed and describes the issues remaining to be addressed for the Division to <br />recommend approval of the setbacks. <br />The appligtion in Exhibits D and E describes setbacks from property boundaries and structures, particularly <br />gas/oil wells and pipelines. However, in Exhibit S the application states that no mining will occur within 200 feet <br />of any structures until the Applicant demonstrates that mining will not affect them or until an agreement is <br />reached with owners of structures to allow mining within 200 feet. If agreements are forged with persons having <br />an interest in the structures, and the agreements are drafted in the format required by Rule 6.4.19 and Section <br />34-32.5-115(4)(e), C.R.S., the Division's concerns will be satisfied and the setbacks specified in the agreements <br />will be approved. <br />If agreements cannot be reached with persons having an interest in the structures, Rule 6.4.19 provides the <br />option for the Applicant to prepare an engineering evaluation demonstrating that the proposed mine plan will be <br />protective of the structures. The application states that the depth of mining will be on the order of 45 feet and up <br />l0 60 feet. Where setbacks are discussed, a distance of 25 feet from gas/oil wells and pipelines is specified. If <br />actual dredge mining or conventional mining were to occur up to a 25 foot setback line with a near vertical 45 to <br />60 foot mine face, the integrity of the structure to be protected would be threatened. The Division will not accept <br />a 25 foot setback from the mining face to critical structures for a pit depth of 45 to 60 feet unless an acceptable <br />engineering demonstration of stability is provided. The application appears to address this issue in Exhibit D <br />where it is stated that: <br />When a dredge is used the native materials tend to sluff off the banks and assume an angle of repose <br />of 2% h to 1 v. This happens because the material in this an:a is unconsolidated and vertical slopes <br />can not be maintained as mining occurs. This means that to maintain a setback of 100 feet when the <br />gravel is 60 feet thick that mining line has to be no less than 75 feet inside the setback lines fo allow for <br />the sloughing. <br />The slope configuration and geometry discussed in the above quote are illustrated in the following diagram: <br />• Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.