My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57464
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57464
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:27:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/15/1999
Doc Name
ENUMERATION OF WILDLIFE CONCERNS SENT TO BLM
From
DOW
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Larry Shults <br />Page 4 <br />Sage Grouse: <br />Expected sage grouse impacts from the American Soda proposal are limited to sagebrush- <br />dominated areas and adjacent mountain shrub communities on Barnes Ridge and the adjacent ridge to <br />the southeast along the pipeline corridor. Sage grouse populations in the Piceance Creek Basin aze <br />experiencing along-term population decline. This decline is largely believed to be due to habitat <br />fragmentation through vegetation changes and development within the Basin. Recent research <br />conducted by CDOW in the Barnes Ridge vicinity showed significant sage grouse use of the area for <br />nesting and brood rearing. Concerns identified in the DEIS include disturbance and resulting <br />breeding failure of sage grouse using the Stewart Lek adjacent to the pipeline. Nest destruction is <br />_`- -- --also expected to increase due to trampling associated with pipeline construction. These~impacts can - <br />be lazgely mitigated by adhering to the stipulations in the DEIS: that the pipeline will be laid on the <br />side of the corridor away from the lek (east side) within 1.5 miles either side of the lek and the March <br />1 to July 15 exclusion period for ground disturbing construction activities. The activity prohibition <br />prior to 08:00 a.m. will eliminate most breeding disturbance on the lek itself. <br />Cumulative impacts are expected from the addition of another pipeline to the corridor and the <br />resultant widening of its footprint. These impacts stem from conversion of diverse vegetative <br />communities including sagebrush and forbs to largely grass dominated strips. The total corridor has <br />grown wide enough that grouse use appeazs to be diminishing. Forts known to be used by sage <br />grouse should be included in the seed mix in amounts agreeable to the proponent, CDOW and BLM. <br />That seed mix should be planted along the pipeline corridor in areas crossing sagebrush and mountain <br />shrub vegetative types along Barnes Ridge and the adjacent ridge to the southeast. Use of the <br />pipeline corridor could also be encouraged by planting big sagebrush in strips or patches along the <br />cortidor to provide escape cover for grouse. The DEIS specifically prohibits the inclusion of shrubs <br />in seed mixes used on the pipeline corridor. <br />Forts were planted on previous pipelines and became well established. Aerial spraying for <br />noxious weeds on those pipelines removed the forbs and greatly reduced use of the corridor by sage <br />grouse. CDOW recommends that future weed control on the American Soda pipeline consist of spot <br />treatment-from the ground- <br />Migratory Birds: <br />The DEIS identifies possible danger and loss of migratory birds using the evaporation pit at the <br />Piceance site and the evaporation and MVR purge ponds at the Pazachute site and states that <br />American Soda would remediate problem ponds. Such remediation, including netting, would only <br />occur after hypersalinity, migratory bird use and significant migratory bird mortality were <br />documented from each pond. Documentation described in the DEIS consists ofsemi-annual water <br />quality analysis and migratory bird observation at unspecified periods. It is well established that <br />hypersaline waters can cause illness and mortality of migratory birds using the waters. The DEIS <br />states that all three ponds will have hypersaline waters during their life expectancies and that all three <br />wilt remain open in winter due to elevated temperatures. It is reasonable to assume that migratory <br />birds will use all three ponds, particularly as pond water is limited in the Piceance and Pazachute <br />areas. It is also reasonable to assume that if the waters pose a toxic or crystallization threat and that <br />birds will use the waters that significant migratory bird injury and/or mortality will result. The <br />monitoring criteria in the DEIS appear inadequate to accurately gauge the impact of the three ponds <br />on migratory birds. Sick and dying birds are frequently difficult to observe or rewver and often <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.