Laserfiche WebLink
-112- <br /> <br />application. There is this -- now, Mr. Cohen brings up this language that <br />says that "the sources and rights shall be investigated by the Board utilizing <br />available sources to obtain the necessary information in a timely manner prior <br />to the Board's consideration of the application." I hadn't noticed that <br />language before. I -- I'm not entirely sure what it means. I think that it <br />-- I do believe it is ambiguous, and one thing that occurs to me is that the <br />Board may inquire into what the available sources are and what's going to <br />happen here and essentially what the Board is probably going to do is make a <br />determination based on whether or not they think that this plan is going to be <br />complied with or whether the Company can get the -- the water rights, those <br />types of things down the road. Whether the plan is realistic, essentially. <br />So... <br />MR. HOLDER: The real point is they cannot disturb the hydrologic balance. <br /> <br />MR. JOHNSON: Yes. <br />MR. HOLDER: They must have the rights before they use the water. So, as <br />far as I'm concerned, we are assured of minimal disturbance to the hydrologic <br />balance, by the testimony we've heard. <br />MS. WINTER: Yeah, I wonder if this is somewhat like the legal right to <br />enter, in which this Company makes this statement that they have the legal <br />right to enter and we do not go beyond that statement. <br />MR. BARRY: Yeah, I would agree that certainly based on my past <br />experience on this Board, the problem is even if we receive detailed <br />information about somebody's water rights, what the flow is, what the average <br />annual yield is, all that, we can't do anything with that information. We <br />have absolutely no enforcement authority ability or otherwise. <br /> <br />