Laserfiche WebLink
• 2.9 TIME OF SAMPLING <br />All quantitative data were collected in July 1983. <br />2.10 SPECIES DIVERSITY <br />Species/lifeform diversity was calculated for each study area by deter- <br />mining the number of species having a relative cover exceeding 3 percent and <br />grouping these by lifeform. <br />2.11 RANGE CONDITION AND CARRYING CAPACITY <br />Range site descriptions from the Southern Rocky Mountains Land Resource <br />Area of the Soil Conservation Service 15C5 1963, 19751 were reviewed along with <br />vegetation Icover and production) information from the 1983 field program. <br />Those range sites most applicable to the study area were selected. The percent <br />of original vegetation composition present in each range site was estimated <br />based on the 1983 field cover and production data. The appropriate range <br />condition of each range site was then estimated based on the percent of original <br />vegetation composition present as follows: 0 to 25 percent--"poor"; 25 to <br />50 percent--"fair"; 50 to 75 percent--"good"; and 75 to 100 percent--"excellent." <br />Carrying capacity for cattle was determined from the 1983 herbaceous production <br />• estimates assuming a 50 percent utilization of forage, an oven-dry weight to <br />air-dry weight conversion factor of 1.11, and an animal unit monthly air-dry <br />forage requirement of 900 pounds. <br />2.12 AGENCY COORDINATION <br />In September of 1982, Mike Savage and Ed Bischoff of CMLRD, Paul Wynn and <br />Jim Hendricks of Pueblo Coal, Terry Schulz of Pioneer Engineering, and David <br />Buckner of WRD met in the field on the Carbon Junction site to discuss recTi- <br />fying deficiencies in vegetation information in an application submitted by <br />Pueblo Coal for a permit to mine. It was decided that it would be necessary <br />to gather quantitative vegetation data and threatened/endangered plant informa- <br />tion in subsequent studies. It was determined by CMLRD that it was too late in <br />the year to sample the woody communities but the primarily herbaceous old field <br />community could still be sampled in 1982. N'ith technical assistance from <br />WRD, Pioneer Engineering and Pueblo Coal untlertook the old field sampling and <br />data analysis and submitted a report on that vegetation type to CMLRD. It <br />should be noted that it was agreed that the old field was not to be returned <br />to the postmining landscape so no reference area was located and sampled for <br />that type. <br />For the remaining vegetation of the site (Pinyon-Juniper Woodland, Pinyon- <br />Juniper Caprock, and Mountain Shrublandl, the necessary studies were stipulated <br />as a condition of permit issuance. These studies were undertaken by WRD, <br />although Pueblo Coal supplied fieltl assistance. <br />• <br />-6- <br />