Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM <br />Stockponda or Sumps <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Roy Karo <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Stoc kpond <br />SITE NAME: T-33 <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II <br />MINE I.D. NO.: C-80-005 <br />DATE: 8/20/2002 <br />DATE LAST INSPECTION: 6/20/2002 <br />LOCATION: NE3'.NE n, Sec Z, T5N, R87W <br />LOCATION: 7.1 mi SE of Hayden, CO <br />OWNER'S REP.: Gregg Kitchen <br />Circle or xri to in appropriate response <br />`/ ' /~/y/ <br />*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to <br />the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse <br />conditions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, <br />etc.) in the space on the back of this sheet. <br />1. Angle of slope: 3:1 upstream, 9:1 downstream Total = 7:1 N/A <br />2. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes ~ N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes N/A <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes o N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes N N/A <br />3. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes N/A <br />9. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes N/A <br />5. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes N/A <br />6. *Major erosion problems: Yes N/A <br />7. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes o N/A <br />8. *Erosion of toe: Yes N/A <br />9. *Water impounded against downstream toe: Yes N/A <br />10. Existing embankment freeboard: Approximately 2 feet <br /> <br />11. Increase Decrease in water level: No change feet <br /> <br />12. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes ~N~ N/A <br />13. Spillway erosion: Yes ,ry o/ <br />~ N/A <br />14. *Clogging ~ <br /> // <br />~~ <br /> Spillway channels: Yes ((vcy, N/A <br /> Diversion ditches: Yes ,,~V/ N/A <br />41 <br />