My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO25168
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO25168
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:44:59 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:20:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
10/20/1994
Doc Name
WEST POND AND EAST POND HYDROLOGY AND SEDIMENTOLOGY NATIONAL KING COAL PN C-81-035
From
DMG
To
HARRY RANNEY
Permit Index Doc Type
CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Harry Ranney -2- October 20, 1994 <br />primary discharge tube, after having taken transit readings of various pond features. The <br />following are my revised elevations: <br />Top of embankment <br />Top of emergency weir <br />Top of primary <br />Bottom of pond <br />Map C-13 Elevation <br />7501 <br />7500 <br />7498.21 <br />7492.5 <br />Revised Elevation <br />7391 <br />7390 <br />7387.5 <br />7382.5 <br />I used the curve numbers of 73 for north-facing undisturbed areas and 86 for the yard area, <br />since these are the values the Division suggested the operator use (See Kent's memo to you, <br />dated December 9, 1993). I used a total area of 21.6 acres rather than the 24.6 acres the <br />operator used. The east side diversion ditch reduced the land area draining to the west pond. <br />My Sedcad run calculated a yearly sediment load of .13 acre-feet, rather than the .OS acre- <br />feet used in the operator's design. My pond elevation-capacity figures were very close to <br />the operator's figures. My calculations show a pond capacity, up to the top of the <br />emergency spillway weir, of 1.82 acre-feet, as compared to 1.864 acre-feet that the operator <br />obtained. <br />For the east pond, I, again, attempted to correlate map C-4 elevations with map C-13 <br />features. However, the transit readings that I had obtained showed that the elevation of the <br />top of the emergency spillway weir of the east pond was 2.05 feet lower than the elevation of <br />the top of the emergency spillway weir of the west pond. The operator's figures on map C- <br />13 show a difference of 3 feet. I used my Figures. Also, I changed the elevation of the <br />primary discharge structure., based on the transit data. The following are my revised <br />elevations: <br />Map C-13 Elevation <br />Top of embankment <br />Top of emergency weir <br />Top of primary <br />Bottom of pond <br />7498 <br />7497 <br />7493.81 <br />7485.5 <br />Revised Elevation <br />7389 <br />7387.95 <br />7386.15 <br />7376.5 <br />The volume of water entering the east pond due to the runoff from back to back 10 year - 24 <br />hour and 25 year - 24 hour events was calculated to be .27 acre-feet by me and .21 acre - <br />feet by the operator. The sediment volume was .01 acre-feet in the operator's designs and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.