My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57005
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:26 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:16:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/20/2005
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 7 Hydrology
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A pumping test was conducted at a Seneca II-W production well <br />completed in the Trout Creek Sandstone. The results of this <br />test provide a transmissivity of 23.3 ft2/day and a hydraulic • <br />conductivity of 1.8 ft/day. Stewart (1983) describes the Trout <br />Creek Sandstone as having a transmissivity of 1 to 2,800 <br />ftz/day and a hydraulic conductivity of 0.006 to 4 ftJday. <br />Data obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (Stanley G. <br />Robson, written communication, 1987) indicate that hydraulic <br />conductivity values for the Trout Creek Sandstone have a random <br />spatial distribution and a geometric mean of 5.1x103 ft/day in <br />the Twenty Mile Park area. <br />As the discussion above indicates, the aquifers underlying the <br />Seneca II leasehold are low yielding and cannot be ccnsidered <br />important regional aquifers (see Figure 7-2 for a comparison of <br />aquifer properties and well potential). Wells completed in <br />these strata can be expected to produce only very small <br />quantities of water for domestic or livestock use. In most <br />cases, drilling depths make it infeasible to complete livestock <br />or domestic wells in the deeper formations. As discussed • <br />earlier, poor water quality also limits ground water use in the <br />mine area. <br />It should be noted that due to the low yielding nature of <br />aquifers in the Seneca II area, the majority of aquifer tests <br />performed were some variation of a slug or bailer test. Since <br />these tests stress a relatively small volume of the aquifer, <br />transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity values discussed <br />above probably reflect conditions immediately near the well <br />bores. <br />3. Recharge Capacity <br />In addition to changing the ground water regime, mining of the <br />Seneca II site will also temporarily change infiltration rates. <br />Table 7-16 gives a summary of infiltration rates of various <br />soil types before and immediately after mining. These nwnbers • <br />7-50b Revised G4/30/90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.