Laserfiche WebLink
• II <br />An Overview of Cultural Forces in the~Project Vicinity <br />American Indian Tradition <br />In reference to prehistoric occupations, the study area is outside <br />of both the classic Anasazi and the San Rafael Fremont culture areas. <br />It is, however, located within the geographical area thus far assigned <br />to the Uncompahgre Complex, which, as a regional variant of the Desert <br />culture tradition, has been defined from sites on the Uncompahgre <br />Plateau west of the study area. At this writing few appreciable <br />indications for Anasazi or Fremont manifestations have been noted in the <br />Gunnison "Country." The territory of the historic "Eastern" Ute <br />Peoples (Stewart 1971) covered nearly all of Colorado westward to <br />the Green River in Utah and clear]y encompassed the Gunnison Country <br />as recently outlined by this author in special reference to the <br />Uncompahgre Valley (Baker 1978). According to the most recent investi- <br />gations, the Utes are credited with a long occupation in west-central <br />Colorado, and Buckles (1971) has directly postulated that ancestral <br />Utes are responsible for leaving the archaeological culture record <br />represented in the Uncompahgre Complex. If one accepts Buckles' conclu- <br />sions based on his work on the Uncompahgre Plateau; west-central Colorado <br />may be perceived as having witnessed a relatively steady occupation from <br />• an unknown point in remote prehistory by peoples who participated in <br />the generalized "Archaic" or Desert culture tradition as locally <br />manifested in the Uncompahgre Complex which emerged as "Ute" culture <br />in the historic period. This view is, however, not fully compatible <br />with suggestions of possible population displacements and problems <br />of similarities in archaeological cultures among peoples of potentially <br />differing linguistic backgrounds and cultural heritage. Wormington <br />(1955), Wormington and Lister (1956), and Schroeder (1965) have touched <br />upon such issues, but as of this writing the question of a long Ute <br />ancestry in west-central Colorado is moot, since archaeological data <br />do not exist which will support a counterargument to Buckles' view of <br />a long Ute presence in the area. Much of this issue is linguistic <br />and ethnographic, and will not be resolved in the near future. <br />The chronology which Buckles (Table I) presented for the Uncompahgre <br />Complex is, thus far, the only specific cultural chronology which <br />is rooted in archaeological excavation and applicable to the Gunnison <br />drainage in the vicinity of the present study area. Buckles has <br />postulated nine Phases, in the evolution of the Uncompahgre Complex as <br />it emerged following the Paleo-Indian tradition, which, regionally <br />speaking, is poorly understood. According to Buckles, these Phases <br />commence with the Shavano Phase about 7,000 B.C. and end with the <br />Es Galante Phase which, in a general way, represents the historic Ute <br />Culture (Buckles 1971: Table 6). <br />