My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE56926
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE56926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:22 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 9B ARCHAEOLOGY APPENDIX PART 4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that a few homesteads may have been estahlished early in the century <br />• around the higher parks under the Preemption Act, the majority seem <br />to have been taken up under later acts. The incentives provided by <br />the increased acreages of the later acts favored the stockmen and worked <br />together with a heavier population of land seekers and depression of <br />the local fruit industry, and perhaps even the cattle market, to make <br />subsistence settlement and acquisition of the more marginal land a <br />worthwhile goal for many individuals. As one example, the three to <br />four miles of narrow parks along Stevens Gulch near Paonia (Baker 1977) <br />witnessed contemporaneous, and seemingly seasonal, homesteading by <br />about eight different family heads. As in other areas of marginal lands, <br />the majority of the homesteaders "proved-up" and promptly sold out <br />their holdings (Baker 1976 and 1977; and Morrell 1977). The end result <br />was accumulation of large tracts of land by a few ranchers who managed <br />to hold on economically while the majority of individuals found it <br />necessary or at least advantageous to sell out. Today, one will note <br />the presence of larger tracts of land held by a few successful ranchers <br />and the ruins of many, many small homesteads or cow camps in the high <br />country of the Gunnison Country. <br />The higher parks above the North Fork and Gunnison, and major features <br />such as Grand Mesa (Peck .1945), unquestionably witnessed some seasonal <br />occupation in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in conjunction <br />with the range cattle industry. At that time there were, however, <br />few people, many head of stock, and vast open lands. Even if every <br />rancher from the Valley had maintained a "cow camp" in the high country, <br />• the density of these features would not have been great. Simply stated, <br />a cow camp is a seasonally utilized ranching facility which serves as <br />a local base of operations for those who work the cattle. Homesteading <br />is closely involved with the evolution of ranching and the phenomenon <br />of "cow camps." The Homesteading Tradition thus evolves through some <br />basic evolutionary stages but is nevertheless a basic cu]tural tradition <br />in the Euroamerican occupational record of the area. As a tradition, <br />however, its evolution is associated with the basic phases of occupation <br />herein summarized. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.