My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE56926
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE56926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:22 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 9B ARCHAEOLOGY APPENDIX PART 4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A Paleo-Indian occupation has not yet been clearly demonstrated or <br />• temporally bracketed in this area, but some people bearing this tradi- <br />tion seem to have been present in the area about 8,000 or 9,000 B.C, as <br />indicated by occasional isolated finds of Folsom points in scattered <br />iocaTes of western Eolorado (Toll 1977: Fig. 51 and Jennings 1968:16). <br />It is possible that a pre-projectile cultural stage, such as projected <br />by Krieger (1964), could yet be demonstrated in western Colorado. <br />Jennings (1968) discussed this, but there is as yet no evidence of <br />such a stage in the region. If such evidence were found to be present <br />it could push the cultural chronology of the area back many thousand <br />years beyond that of the Paleo-Indian. Generally, evidence of pre- <br />historic Indian occupation in mountainous regions, such as those of <br />the Gunnison Country, has been sparse and is generally believed to <br />represent seasonal exploitation of the environment with little evidence <br />of permanent year-round occupation (Lister 1962:45, Schroeder 1953, <br />and Baker 1980). <br />Some archaeologists working in western Colorado loosely speak of the <br />Archaic stage which followed the Paleo-Indian and preceded the <br />historic Ute tradition. In using the term "Archaic," these individuals <br />are, however, generally speaking of the basic Desert culture (Jennings 1957) <br />or pre- or incipient pottery tradition which is locally reflected in the <br />Uncompahgre Complex. As pointed out by Buckles, this tradition may <br />have persisted in the area for nearly 9,000 years. In this period <br />it has been postulated that the tradition remained generally stable <br />(Buckles 1971) but underwent minor adjustments in the cultural assemblage <br />• as a response to local environmental adaptations and contact with <br />peoples of the Fremont and Anasazi persuasions in the general period <br />ca. 700 to 1300, or thereabouts. <br />It is important to note on an ethnohistorical basis, however, that <br />the Escalante Phase (Table 1) may only be representative of the <br />historic Ute culture in the early historic period. Once the Utes <br />acquired horses, their cultural profile changed dramatically from <br />that of the early historic period. It certainly changed again as part <br />of the Utes reservation experience during what some ethnohistorians <br />refer to as the phase of Administrative Stabilization (Leacock and <br />Lurie 1971:9-12). So, while the Escalante Phase may represent the <br />early historic profile of the Utes, this profile was almost certainly <br />altered enough in the course of the contact experience that one should <br />be prepared to recognize at least two more potential cultural phases <br />within the Escalante. <br />As outlined, most of the available regional archaeological data is <br />drawn from the Uncompahgre Plateau and other area west of the actual <br />Rocky Mountains which encompass most of the Gunnison Country and <br />the Grand Mesa Project area. There is no local chronology for the <br />project area except that for west-central Colorado in general. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.