My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE56664
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE56664
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:11 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:09:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/16/2003
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 6 Phase II Stability Analysis - Geotechnical Engineering Study
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M03030GE <br />• formational material was encountered in test boring 2 to a depth of <br />about thirty (30) feet, the maximum depth or the test boring. <br />Free subsurface water was not encountered in test borings at the <br />time of our field study. We anticipate that the free subsurface <br />water may become perched on the surface of the formational material <br />with time and may be variable with time. <br />It is difficult to predict if unexpected subsurface conditions <br />will be encountered during construction. Since such conditions may <br />be found, we suggest that the owner and the contractor make provi- <br />sions in their budget and construction schedule to accommodate <br />unexpected subsurface conditions. <br />3.0 SLOPE STABILITY <br />l~ <br />• <br />The stability of any slope is dependent on many factors. Typi- <br />cally the stability of a slope is analyzed by calculating the <br />anticipated gravitational forces that tend to drive the mass of <br />soil downhill and the anticipated internal strength of the soil <br />along the expected plane of failure that will resist the downhill <br />movements. .If the driving forces are equal to or greater than the <br />resisting forces then failure is imminent. We understand that the <br />minimum theoretical calculated factor of safety of 1.3 is consid- <br />ered by the Division of Minerals and Geology as a minimum factor of <br />safety for a slope. to be considered. Our stability analysis is <br />based on this understanding of a minimum theoretical calculated <br />factor of safety of 1.3. <br />Factors that have an adverse influence on slope stability can <br />generally be classified as those that increase the stress (driving <br />force) on the system or decrease the strength (resisting forces) of <br />the soil. <br />Our stability analyses of the existing reclamation fill slope was <br />based on the Bishops Method of Slices. This method is based on the <br />assumption that the slope soil mass will fail in a rotation mode on <br />a circular arc plane. In this method of analysis the mass of soil <br />is divided into vertical slices. The forces acting on each slice <br />are evaluated from the equilibrium of the slices; that is, the <br />forces that tend to drive the slice downhill and the forces that <br />tend to resist the movement of the slice. The equilibrium of the <br />entire mass is determined by summing the driving and summing the <br />resisting forces acting on all slices and comparing these forces. <br />Our slope stability analysis was performed using "Slope Stability <br />Analysis'I program by Geosoft computer software. Our slope stabil- <br />ity analysis considered one (1) cross section provided by Mr. <br />3 <br />llam6ert ana ~,~~ociate~ <br />CONSULTING GEOTECH NICAL EN GIN EENS AND <br />M ATE ALAI TESTING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.