My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO24859
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO24859
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:44:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:05:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
1/31/1998
Doc Name
EVALUATION OF BEAR 3 MINE LANDSLIDE
Permit Index Doc Type
OTHER SURFACE WATER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Evaluation of Bear No. 3 Mine Landslide <br />landslide, however, coal in this area was mined more than ten years ago and surface strains <br />would have occurred prior to the recent instability. <br />Slopes in materials which have sheaz strengths only ntazginally higher than the slope angle <br />experience "creep." Creep occurs because the material in the slope must strain significantly to <br />mobilize the peak strength necessary to support its own weight. As the strain progresses, some <br />weak materials such as those found on this hillside, experience a decrease in shear strength from <br />the peak to the residual value. No change in moisture content is necessary for this stress-strain <br />reversal to occur. However, typically, the movement results in tension cracks which open in the <br />slide mass and allow the entry of surface water. Based on the available data, it is possible that <br />the recent landslide occurred in a neazly dry over-steepened slope. Available laboratory shear <br />strength data and limit equilibrium calculations on nearby slopes with similar angles indicates <br />they aze at or below a factor of safety of 1 without hydrostatic forces resulting from groundwater <br />flow. <br />The mechanism ofren responsible for initiation of landslide movement is water. Water has a <br />tendency to both increase the forces which drive a landslide and by way of saturation decrease <br />the soil strengths which resist the downslope movement. There appear to be three possible <br />sources of groundwater at this site: 1) surface precipitation which has infiltrated through the slide <br />mass to the colluvial bedrock contact, 2) flow within the B- or C-Seam workings behind the <br />landslide, and 3) groundwater flow independent of the mining operations. <br />Based on the available data, there is no evidence to support the last two sources of groundwater. <br />All observers of the landslide have reported no seeps, springs, or wet azeas on the slide mass. In <br />addition, with the exception of the lower over-steepened slopes which continue to ravel, the <br />major landslide movement took place in a relatively short period of time and has since stabilized. <br />If the slide was being driven by a significant hydrostatic pressure, we would anticipate that <br />movement would continue and/or a surface reflection of the seeping groundwater could be <br />observed. <br />831-032.411 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.