My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE56352
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE56352
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:58:57 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:02:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 20 REVEGETATION PROCEDURE STUDY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
58 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />As noted in previous recommendation sections, the performance of the treatments • <br />in the experimental design must be viewed against the status of the Reference <br />Areas (Figures 10-12) to see if our work can sufficiently restore the land to <br />predisturbance levels of vegetation growth and ecosystem stability. Vege- <br />tatively, given the eight treatments designed and monitored, we do not have <br />the capability to reclaim the land to a compatible level with the adjacent <br />undisturbed areas. Plant response on Treatment 2 yielded 80% of the biomass <br />produced on the reference sites with the other amended spoils displaying a ~ <br />wide range of responses (Figure 10). Cover on Treatment 2, which exhibited <br />the greatest value in the Main Plot, was only one-half of that occurring in <br />the natural ecosystem. Finally, density which is lower by a factor of 70% to <br />80 ;, differs markedly from the Reference Areas too. ~ <br />Since the implementation of this study in 1976 plant biomass and cover <br />values have steadily shown an increase as species have become established, - . <br />with density displaying a moderate decline thorugh time as the plant canopy <br />and root networks closed (past progress reports). Considering the young age <br />of the revegetation plots and the suboptimal seedbed characteristics created <br />by the black carbonaceous spoils, one might anticipate that with time plant <br />productivity and cover will rise as the various life forms modify the. micro- <br />environment more to their suitability. Only density will probably remain far <br />below that found in the Reference Areas for some time due to characteristics <br />of the seeded species themselves. Their keen competition for site occupation <br />and resource exploitation favors vegetative growth at the expense of reproduc- <br />tive organs. Also, most of the seeded species are not as prolific seeders as <br />weedy species like kochia which was found to contribute significantly to the <br />very high density values observed on the undisturbed areas. Given that our <br />treatments exhibit a trend towards increased stand development, coupled with . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.