Laserfiche WebLink
52 <br />• The only significant difference (p_`.10) found between the gypsum <br />l <br />treatments was a higher biomass and cover for invading forbs on the gypsum <br />treated spoils. In general, the addition of gypsum does not appear to in- <br />fluence the establishment and vigor of seeded species at the Allen Mine. <br />The dominant vegetation occurring on the reclaimed spoil piles are <br />seeded grasses, forbs, and invading forbs. The most successful of these <br />species are outlined in Table 14. <br />Slope Plot <br />The 3:1 Slope Plot supported more vigorous growth than the 1.5:1 plots. <br />On the 3:1 incline, Treatment 2 (no topsoil + straw mulch) displayed the <br />healthiest plants and highest cover and density. Treatment 1 was similar to <br />Treatment 2, and Treatment 3 (the topsoiled subplot) showed only fair plant <br />• growth. For the 1.5:1 plots, Treatments 3 and 2 shared honors as being better <br />~ than Treatment 1, but all three treatments showed poorer growth than the worst <br />treatment on the 3:1 slope. As a final comment, the plastic straw netting was <br />at least 80; intact on Treatment 2 but the straw had decomposed, the excelsior <br />mat covered approximately 85n of the spoils in the 1:3 plots and only 25; on <br />the 1.5:1 grade, and the paper netting on the topsoiled treatment was very <br />fragmented and no longer functional. <br />Species holding some promise for vegetation establishmen*_ on sloped <br />areas are intermediate wheatgrass (Ac:•ept~rcn irte_"^s~~z~), slender wheatgrass <br />(c:o?:~ror dracr;acauiu~r), western wheatgrass (__ _:•c•: .~.~.~~._-:), and titer <br />milkvetch (.-lstrz;¢~xs titer). <br />Species Evaluation Plot <br />This plot was established to investigate the growth habits of many <br />. - species not appearing in the Main Plot mixture in regards to adaptability to <br />