Laserfiche WebLink
February 27, 1998 <br />WQCD Letter <br />Page 7 <br />did say that we would have a concern with this language if manual discharges would <br />not be required to meet primary limits. WQCD commented in Part II. below that it <br />would evaluate our request. We would appreciate being informed of WQCD's <br />decision. <br />1 1. WQCD's response clarified one of our concerns, that being whether a 72 hour <br />discharge would be considered "continuous" or "intermittent". Thank you. <br />WQCD also informed us of WQCD's verbal instructions to permittees with regard to <br />intermittent discharges. Thank you. <br />We again reiterated our request that WQCD require sampling of each manual <br />discharge for determining compliance as manual discharges are not currently <br />modeled in Colowyo's ponds to meet any effluent limitations. WQCD commented <br />that it would evaluate our request. We would appreciate being informed of WQCD's <br />decision. <br />We thank the Colorado Water Quality Control Division for reviewing our comments and providing <br />a response. Please do not hesitate to call use if we may be of further assistance. <br />Sincerely, <br />Daniel I. Hernandez <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Michael H. Gibson, HSEQ & Land Manager, Colowyo Coal Company <br />Byron Waker, DMG <br />Kent Gorham, DMG <br />Erica Crosby, DMG <br />Larry Routten. DMG <br />Susan McCannon, DMG <br />Phil Hegeman, WQCD <br />Carla Lenkey, WQCD <br />Dave Akers, WQCD <br />m:\oss\j rc\kubcltr2.dih <br />