1979-10-22_PERMIT FILE - M1979165

• Permit No: M1979165
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 10/22/1979
• Doc Name: SAND AND GRAVEL PIT 3 FN 79-165
• From: LEE AND MARTURANO
• To: MLRB
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

• tiiiiiiitiiiiiitiii
LEE AND MARTURANO, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3470 SOUTH SHERMAN STREET
SUITE 2
ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO 50110
EDWARD S. LEE AREA CODE 303
DONALD E. MARTURANO 761-5010
THOMAS J. TOMAZIN
DOUGLAS E. LARSON
October 22, 1979
James B. McArdle
Geotechnical Reclamation Supervisor
Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board
Room 723, 1313 Sherman Street
Denver, Colorado 80203
Re: Sand and Gravel Pit No. 3
MLRB File No. 79-165
Dear Jim:
In response to your letter dated October 17, 1979, to Albert R.
Frei, a copy of which is attached, those questions raised are
answered as follows:
A. ) The proposed future use of the land is undetermined. The
land owner does not know what he will do with the property
and the operator as set forth in the revised exhibits and
my answer is as follows, will leave a standing lake of 10
acres in Parcel A, and . 9 acres in Parcel B (of course, the
standing ponds of water may vary as much as . 1 acre each
way which is not a very significant amount, and the variance,
if any, would be found in Parcel A rather than Parcel B) .
As I stated and have discussed with the land owner, he is
aware that should he wish to undertake more reclamation than
is set forth in our revised exhibits, i.e. more than just
reclaiming the perimeter and leaving the standing ponds of
water, then he will have to:
1. Procure permits from the County.
2 . Address the questions of clean fill in terms of what it
would do to the water table, pollution, toxicity, etc.
3. Come before the Board for approval of additional reclamation.
4 . This would be his responsibility.
On the other hand, should he agree with the operator to do
additional reclamation as planned presently a Technical
Revision would be in order whereby the operator would come
before the Board and address those same concerns as above.
I