Laserfiche WebLink
<br />z <br />It is essential to maintain an intact, unobstructed riparian corridor of adequate width to provide for the <br />needs and movement of wildlife. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has identified <br />this reach of the Poudre River and upstream as a Potential Mouse Protection Area for the Federal and <br />State listed Preble's meadow jumping mouse, Zapus hudsa:rus preblier. Currently, they are <br />recommending anon-disturbance zone of 100 yards from the centerline of waterways, in either <br />direction, for preservation of Preble's habitat. In discussion on the final guidelines to be incorporated <br />in the yet to be cotttpleted 4D ruling, some biologists aze suggesting that the non-disturbance zone be <br />extended to 100 feet beyond the 100 year flood zone. Until the 4D Wile has been finalized and adopted <br />there is no official setback. Therefore, unless modified by the USFW S, the Division will recommend <br />the 100 yard setback from centerline of the River as anon-distwbance zone on this property. It seems <br />reasonable to honor the conservative standard of 100 yards from the centerline of the river, as a <br />minimr,m setback for non-development along the riparian corridor. In doing this the crucial riparian <br />corridor, essential for species protection and movement by free ranging wildlife would remain intact. <br />Additionally the Division would recommend thatdtking m or near the flood zone, intended to <br />"contain" the river, should not be installed. The ecosystem along Plains streams in Colorado is adapted <br />for and regenerated by periodic flooding. Diking and other attempts at controlling the River are prone <br />to failure, negatively impact riverbottom wet meadows, and adversely affects upstream and <br />downstream neighbors. There is a good reason why development is discouraged in these areas. <br />Ill-designed fencing in and adjacent to the flood plain of the River can trap and injtue wildlife. <br />Improperly designed fences set along road margins increase the hazard of car/deer strikes. Therefore, <br />the Division of Wildlife would recommend that perimeter fencing and interior fencing on this site be <br />kept to a minimum When necessary, the fences should be of a type that will allow the free movement <br />of wildlife. Chain link or other fine mesh fencing material should not be used on this site unless <br />absolutely necessary. These types of fencing should not be used to fence perimeters. Split rail, barb- <br />wire and three strand smooth barb wire fences are acceptable alternatives for wildlife. I've included a <br />couple of designs that provide proper wire spacing for use by wildlife. Where needed, fences <br />paralleling roads should be set back 50-100 yards from the edge of the road to allow space for wildlife <br />to view the road before crossing. We recognize the need of the pit operator to maintain security for <br />the site. if installed, security fencing around the processing area batch phtnt should in several locations <br />be raised two to three inches above ground surface to allow free movement of small mammals. <br />However, there are many gravel sites along the Poudre, including the Hall Irvin site at 83rd Ave, that <br />operate without extensive security fencing. Therefore there does not seem to be a need. <br />Warm water sloughs on the property need to be protected to preserve open water when the site is <br />reclaimed. Warm water sloughs are essential for protecting and holding waterfowl and other wildlife <br />during bitter cold spells. In the original County Permit the protection of the west slough was stipulated <br />as part of the permit requirements. There should be a letter on file from the Division to Shari Eason, <br />of Tuttle Applegate, outlining our ageement for protection of this slough. The division would <br />recommend that other warm water and sloughs found on site should be similarly protected. <br />The pond shoreline contour suggested by Carnas Exhibit F for all reclaimed ponds is 3:1 at water edge <br />and 2:1 at a 10 foot depth. These are standards suggested by the Mined Land Reclamation Board <br />primarily for safety purposes. The reclamation plan for the site suggests that the ponds will be <br />reclaimed as water storage reservoirs (fully lined pits). If this is the case, at times some of the ponds <br />will be drawn down eight or more feet. When this happens the 2:1 contour will be at shoreline. <br />DEPARTMEN"r OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Greg Welcher, Execuuw Ihrector <br />